Uh, how do you plan to cram a big rotary in a metro while maintaining the exterior profile and not moving the driver back (which would be a giveaway)? I think you'd have a tough time doing that even if you put it in the back, particularly with AWD.

Early 80s FWD Corolla. While they are a blast to drive on snow or gravel, they're slow as sarlaac digestion in terms of acceleration, and they're anesthetic on asphalt.

That would be great if you could travel back in time 24 years or so, but people know what to do with 4 cylinder Mustangs now. Also, debadging, unless accompanied by rust, dents, and mismatched body panels, is a giveaway that the car has been fucked with.

That's what Beijing looks like most of the summer.

Southern California?

WTF is up with that photoshopping?

Zoom in. Enhance. Enhance.

In China, I've seen NCKIA and SMASNUG phones.

How is the AWD on the SX4?

Did they have all the same options?

What the fuck is this, Sodahead?

Until there is a photo of a Veyron airborne (on purpose) above a dirt track, no one gets to seriously suggest that.

Until there is a photo of a Veyron airborne (on purpose) above a dirt track, no one gets to seriously suggest that.

Until there is a photo of a Veyron airborne (on purpose) above a dirt track, no one gets to seriously suggest that.

That's true...though Toyota abandoned enthusiasts with far more enthusiasm than Honda did. The 2000s were far less interesting.

Nothing, most likely.

In case you weren't aware, this is also a Daewoo.

IMO the C3s were the best-looking Corvettes. On paper they're the worst, but damn they look good.

"Oh, it was never meant to be a fun car!" Some defense, given that in most generations Honda has managed to make the Accord a fun car, or at least make some version of it fun.

Man, what did Matt Taibbi have planned this time?