Odin
Odin
Odin

The only series of interest for me are Monogatori and Genshiken. I'll probably wait for the blurays for the former as well.

Now you're just lying to try and make your point. That never happens. NPCs only ever open fire if you've been discovered already, at which point the clickers have already been alerted. Otherwise NPCs are completely invisible. I would have ended up hating Ellie if she wasn't. Breaking my stealth constantly would have

My play through was glitch free, but I really hope that the next generation of consoles has less texture pop. Really jarring at times.

They're PS2 titles, most games from that generation hold up pretty well today. Especially when given a HD coat of paint.

Disney owns Marvel now too, they've acquired some major franchises since KH2. If they put Pirates of the Caribbean in I can't see why we couldn't get the Avengers in there somehow.

There are enough real issues of racism without seeing them lurking in every shadow and behind every corner. This is just pure hypersensitivity. It's a pun, nothing more and nothing less. Using a play on words in this situation could be considered poor taste. But it's par for the course where tabloids are concerned.

I'm not sure where people get off defining what a "complete" game is. It's arrogant beyond belief. If you're selling something do you let other people dictate what you're selling? Of course not. Developers decide what the complete game is, not you. It's not your decision to make. The only decision that you need to

The scene in the OR was unintentionally hilarious for me. Because it was one of those moments where time isn't much of an issue. I walked in, tried to walk past the doctor. But of course he was blocking my way. I didn't particularly want to kill him, but there was no choice. So cool as you like Joel just sits down,

There's something in the background that could be considered a spoiler, but the camera has been positioned to block it from view. Without it there's nothing there really that relevant to the plot unless you're looking really hard.

Except that wasn't the ending, not really anyway. That was the build up to the ending. The ending was Joel lying to Ellie.

Uh, bypassing requirements is the foundation of the free to play model. You either play long enough to earn these things or you simply pay real money for them. Either that or you limit it to purely cosmetic upgrades.

The link you sent me proves several of your statements wrong (the University only owned it from about until 2002 not until 2005 like you claimed, after that it appears to have been owned by a bank for a couple of years), and secondly the wayback machine can't accurately determine ownership unless the domain points to

Depends on the game really. If you can stay on a cabinet for over 12 minutes then this is actually a worse value proposition. However it's certainly less punishing for those who aren't as good or are playing competitive games. I'd love to be able to play Gundam Vs for long enough to get the hang of it.

The link you sent me proves several of your statements wrong (the University only owned it from about until 2002 not until 2005 like you claimed, after that it appears to have been owned by a bank for a couple of years), and secondly the wayback machine can't accurately determine ownership unless the domain points to

No wonder I've yet to see the turnip boar. I'm not a morning person.

It's a nightmare because it opens the floodgates to every domain being disputed because someone doesn't think the domain is being used appropriately.

Saying that "big companies bullying out little ones is worse" without actually justifying why it's worse beyond the implication that it's bad simply because they're a big company is an emotional argument no matter how you try and cut it. It's certainly not a logical or rational stance to argue that Nintendo shouldn't

No, it's really not. If you think it is then please go do some reading on the DNS system and understand its purpose. Fuck it, you don't even need to read about it. You should be able to figure it out if you have half a brain.

And exactly how is the fact it was owned by a University in 2001 relevant to my earlier statement that it's been owned by the same entity since 2004. Let's recap shall we? In my original reply I stated:

There's a generic placeholder on there, and there has been a generic placeholder on there for the past nine years. The current owner is not putting it to any use and thus the site is defunct. And yes, a photo and your email would be a sufficient use of a personal website. You are actually putting it to a purpose, even