I think I like it. It looks really good from some angles, not so much from others. Will be easier to tell once I see it in person. It's more interesting than the VCR look at least.
I think I like it. It looks really good from some angles, not so much from others. Will be easier to tell once I see it in person. It's more interesting than the VCR look at least.
In stills yeah, but AC still probably has the edge where motion is concerned.
Oh man the story of XIII had a number of problems. The pacing is absolutely awful. And the manual is required reading to understand it all. Game writing 101: if there is information key to the plot, convey it with dialogue! I think the worst example is the fact that Vanille was originally Ragnarok is revealed in the…
I'm mostly getting an FFVIII vibe off it. VII was more sci-fi with its architecture. But aside from the odd places like Esthar (?) 8 had fairly modern and contemporary looking locations. I have no issue with it, as long as it's not another XIII I'm happy. At least it's a cohesive style, if not necessarily a bold one.…
And all I hear is "I have no idea what apathetic even means! Rather than look it up in a dictionary first I'm going to throw a hissy fit and embarrass myself!"
Hmmm... pretty much yeah.
So yeah, still written by idiots.
Unnamed sources with traces of bias? I'll take that one with a big grain of salt. Honestly I don't think it was last minute, or rather it wasn't a last minute change before E3. There have been a lot of signs that Sony weren't going to follow Microsoft going back to the February reveal. Including a statement from…
Agreed. X had an almost chess like system. Still I'll take an action RPG over XIII any day. It makes me gag when people call XIII's system strategic.
Turn it off? Heck no. I love persistent multiplayer elements like this. You get to be a dick AND shoot down people trying to dick you over. It's win win.
Considering how slow the tweets are popping up and how they only show one at a time they can probably just cherry pick the rare positive ones from the deluded, ignorant, or apathetic consumers still backing Microsoft. They probably had to hire someone, or several someone's, just to find them though.
Unless it's changed since I stopped frequenting it Gizmodo is written by some of the biggest idiots in the blogosphere though. It used to be practically an Apple fan site though. I'd be surprised if they're praising the one instead of talking about how the mythical Apple super TV (that's totally real this time! I…
Excuses. It's impossible for you to debunk anything I say. All you can do is squirm pathetically and try. And fail. Frankly it's easier to converse with a dog. At least they can be made to understand when they're wrong.
Wrong. If you bothered to read you'd know why. And the only reason you're not reading is because you know how well and truly owned you are.
Not true. It was a core feature of the PS3 as well. It's easy to forget about it but the Sixaxis and the Dualshock 3 have motion controls. Yes it's up to the developers, but the problem is that I can see a lot of developers just not using it. Or if they do use it, it coming across as gimmicky or awkward. Much like it…
Wow, it's rare that someone hands me everything I need to utterly destroy them on a silver platter. But thank you, because that's what you've just done. You've lost kid, and you're so far gone you don't even realise it. It almost seems mean to do what I'm about to do.
Which would be a good thing if it was a universally useful feature for gaming. But the thing is it's not. Not all games will benefit from motion gestures or voice commands. In fact most won't. But because it's there developers may just try and tack on elements that use it. Which often end up gimmicky at best to…
Oh man! You're killing me here! Just stop! I can barely catch my breath over all the laughing. You couldn't rip your way out of a paper bag kid. And you've done absolutely nothing to back up your fallacious claims. I believe I asked a question earlier, where exactly is your answer? Hmm? Yeah, that's what I thought.
Hah! That's rich kid. If my brain is little then doesn't that mean you'd need a microscope to find yours? If you think that doing nothing to support it and actively moving away from it on their first party titles constitutes "indirectly blocking used games" then the only deluded one here is you. You're not more…
Awww, you're butthurt about being wrong! That's ADORABLE. You're just gonna dig that whole deeper aren't ya. You were wrong. Deal with it.