No, no argument, just trying to understand, and trying to frame my dilemma this issue engenders.

No, I’m not. That’s your personal inference.

Are you saying those able but lacking access are effectively disabled, and should be eligible for ADA protection?

I hate those toilets! They’re worse than the drive-thrus sized for trucks and SUVs when in a sedan.

Should the able lacking online access be entitled to equal compensation?

Alan’s a skywriter, eh? Cool gig.

Why is the property crime so high there? That depresses rents, but I hope you can avoid losing anything.

No, not SOP, however:

What are you implying that you infer I’m inferring???

“No suspects.”

OK, but then don’t ask for my jumper cables.

Starred mostly for final paragraph.

Two words: inclement weather.

If need was the only driver of our economy, we’d be in big trouble and you would not have been able to post your question.

You think Uber Eats exists everywhere? Or are you merely urban-focused?

Didn’t In-and-Out precede CF in taking orders by a wireless mic-equipped staff member armed with a tablet?

Simple: guilt.

Prolly not “that much money” to them.

I really don’t think Maron was critiquing the film with his comments, but, rather, its director’s response to an inquiry as to why he was no longer directing comedy.

One wag wrote: