In fairness, the AI would probably have spelled it correctly. 

Uh huh, what studies? Because the most populous areas in the US vote liberal. Conservatives would be out in the cold if the electoral college didn’t lend more weight to rural (and statistically conservative) voters.

Thankth, Tham Barthanti!

Proof-read! For fuck’s sake!

I see that the switchover to AI is proving to be worst the cost in product quality.

We kept trying to program ChatBot with conservative values, but the AI told us it was illogical to drink bleach instead of getting a vaccine or that it’s inhumane to tell certain people they shouldn’t exist or that an insurrection is not the best way to elect a democratic leader. ChatBot is so liberal!

Do they even have editors at “Gawker” any longer?

Worth headline ever!

Worth month?

See the problem with accusing companies of promoting liberalism and suppressing conservatism, is much of these things are by and large automated. Google shows liberal-leaning results because data shows that’s what people want. Chat gpt has left leaning bias because the people and conversations its pulling data from…

Yeah, what exactly is the “center” position between “I believe this group of people should be afforded the same rights and respect as another group” and “I believe this group has no right to exist”?

If chat GPT being woke means it doesn’t espouse anti-LGBT beliefs I’m ok with that. There seems to be a lot of sensitivity on the right currently about saying some groups of humans should be allowed to exist and have bodily autonomy. But if the training data was from diverse, respectable sources, IE: not brietbart and…

Being *proudly* anti-union is the problem, not that they’re just a non-union shop. Also, his asset control system is for absolute shit if they accidentally commit conversion, but you can guess that based on the amount of stuff that ends up at employees houses. They stole that prototype.

I switched to a color laser 9 years ago, and it’s still going strong. It happens to be HP, but thankfully before they started some of their worst greediness. I use 3rd party toner and will never update the firmware. I will never buy a new inkjet, of any brand.

Someone has to be blamed and the new person is Sandra Bullock who didn’t write the story or have anything to do with production (other than being hired to play a role).

I mean...yeah, she played a role in a movie.
Except that, right now, she had nothing to do with it.
Why should she be punished?
Whats next? Should the director and writer give their money back that they earned because they also helped to “enshrine” someone that maybe didn’t deserve it?
Should everyone part of the movie…

I don’t get why the author is trying to call into doubt whether or not Sandra Bullock knew about this situation. How would she know? She was given a script, and probably met the woman she pretended to be a few times in controlled situations where that woman would have been pretending to be great.

It is absolutely not an exaggeration to say she had nothing to do with this.  She got a script, was given a role, and performed it well.  Why assume otherwise without a shred of evidence?  What exactly did you learn as a student of journalism?

So in other words, a good thing happened. A publisher failed to make a deal that would have likely generated money for a tyrannical, mass-murdering regime that oppresses the freedoms of countless people... and has a penchant for literally chopping journalists up into pieces and stuffing them into suitcases.

Yo that’s absolutely wonderful news. Fuck the Saudi royal family and the companies taking money from them.