The driver is 100% at fault because they are the driver who is supposed to be in control of their car. Not because of Capitalism.

The driver is definitely at fault - yes, because of the legal jargon slung at the driver before they’re allowed to use the system, and yes, because the driver is in charge and has to exercise the judgment and caution required to make sure they don’t go around endangering people. That part is a slam dunk, unless…

It may be a defense to criminal liability, but as far as injured third parties go, any agreement the driver has with Tesla are between the driver and Tesla. At most, the driver might have to indemnify Tesla, but if they’re insolvent, Tesla will have to pay its share of the damages.

My understanding (and it’s going off memory) is that the truck wasn’t “on track”, but off it, and that the crash happened when she was coming into the pits at the end of a run. I am also under the impression that the rear ramp on the truck was down, sitting parallel to the ground, and just the right (wrong) height for…

She ran helmet-first into the loading ramp of the truck.  Had it been 8 inches lower, it might have taken her head off.

Hey now that’s uncalled for.

God I hope they don’t give the mantle to this anti-vaxx dipshit.

After rewrites, Marvel are confident that fans will hardly notice Shuri’s absence from large parts of the film, which is explained by other characters remarking that she’s off ‘doing her own research’.

Holy shit that is an awful take. Like absolute trash-tier.

My sympathies are with people who try to earn a living buy cannot make a living wage, not people who decide to commit crimes instead of attempting to be productive and working for a living. Some may think that this is a victimless crime because only the big retailers and freight companies have to pay but in reality,…

The apologist thing is getting fucking ridiculous, no question.

If they were stealing food and blankets, I’d have a little sympathy.

So that excuses stealing?

I wonder if Erin would be quite as cool with stealing if thieves broke into her home and took her stuff. The thought experiment can assume that these thieves are “suffering from income inequality” or are “desperate”. Perhaps “shit has even been real” lately for them?

This weird apologist take is just bad. These people are thieves, stealing things from OTHER people who legitimately bought something despite the poor economy.

This is a very weird take.

Criminals doing criminal things.  What else is new?

Stealing is not a good thing to do, we all know that. Thieves are out to make a quick buck at the expense of someone else. But this strikes me more as desperate, wholesale looting than property crime.

“Now, every outlet is calling these folks thieves, and sure, that’s technically correct.”

This weird apologist take is just bad. These people are thieves, stealing things from OTHER people who legitimately bought something despite the poor economy. This isn’t a stick-it-to-bezos thing. This is impacting folks like you and me who work to pay their bills, then get their hard-earned shit stolen by someone who…