She does. But I find it a tad boring.
She does. But I find it a tad boring.
Juliette Lewis looks unrecognizably cute, chic and elegant. Better than I've ever seen her, EVER.
You're hilarious. There is huge difference between "celebrating" female sexuality/beauty and the sexual objectification of women within showbiz to help "sell" them and their brand to the public. But keep on keeping on in your demented belief that J. Lo's crotch baring leotard is all about empowerment and "celebration"…
IN MY OPINION: It just seems that Beyonce refuses to label herself as such because it makes her less marketable since people read "feminist" and think "I burn my bra and hate menfolk lololol." That's what I think it is, but it could be that her hesitation is brought on by the history of the treatment of WOC by white…
Only if we've completely embraced the capitalist 'empowerment = money' paradigm. I think we can do better.
If she doesn't want to relate to the movement, then she shouldn't say anything about it. She shouldn't perform in concerts dedicated to educating and empowering women all over the world if she doesn't actually back it, which is how I feel. If she doesn't want to be "labeled" a feminist, then I guess she shouldn't say…
Thank you. I feel like she is just kind of a "missing the point of feminism" person, much like Taylor Swift who said that she wasn't a feminist because she never thought of the world as "Boys vs. Girls" which again, not the point at all.
Yeah, that one. Who is under scrutiny for being on the cover of that particular magazine because it makes no sense. She is a feminist when it suits her, and I don't dig that. http://www.thefrisky.com/2013-05-20/bey…
But that's the real problem, isn't it? That she won't out and say it. If she was really "all about female empowerment and girls ruling the world," why can't she just say it? Personally, I think being true to yourself and your beliefs is more important than being marketable, which is what it seems like she is doing by…
Leotards are not my definition of badass, even leather ones. I think black leather pants would have been more appropriate. Sexy and badass but without showing skin AND they would have still highlighted her fabulously strong legs. She's always in a fucking leotard or something else with her boobies, bum and/or legs…
That's not my point. My point is that she gets so offended by it, like being a feminist is dirty, that I don't understand her involvement in this movement/concert. It seems contradictory to her previous statements. They have all been covered here. Idk, not my place to judge I guess. I was just really disappointed that…
Was anyone else CRAZY DISAPPOINTED in the fact that Beyonce was a performer last night? After her wishy-washy responses in regards to feminism and women's rights, I was shocked to see her as a performer and more than a little upset about it. Madonna should have been more prevalent than she was since she actually does…
The second video clearly shows that the incident was triggered by a woman hitting the ship with a bottle — I hope they find her.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Evo Psych is a failed hypothesis masquerading as a field of study.
He's an evolutionary psychologist. A field notorious for people spouting off bullshit about how cultural specific norms are actually biologically ingrained results of human evolution.
The guy is a professor of evolutionary psychology, though. If there's a discipline better suited to backing up arbitrary and problematic cultural beliefs with fake-ass "science," I don't know what it is.
Wait, would this be like the willpower needed to think before tweeting?