So, in essence, all you would need to do is grab a domain that your country has ownership over? Most Canadian sites that use .com use .ca as well anyways. I don't see this as a big of a deal as people are making it out to be.

Does this mean that Canada can seize any .ca site? Or that China can seize any .cn site? This would technically be fair if it works for anyone across the board.

Isn't saying that they're "original" kind of misleading, when the real original was the Hydrox cookies?

Don't like gay sex? Don't hit on Kaiden and ask him to have sex with you. Seems simple enough to me.

The look on that guy's face totally reeks of "This is serious! I know because the government told me!"

Ah. I'm using the non-adjustable one.

The deadzone hasn't given up yet in the left joystick?

I'm having my third one shipped to me now. They fall apart really easily and I'm pretty gentle with it.

Can someone explain to me like I'm five why Google favouring their own products in their search engine is a bad thing? It's their free service. They can do what they want with it. If you don't like it, there are other search engines.

Proxies and out of country anonymous free hosting. There's always a way.

End result is that you still will be able to. The software that lets you jailbreak will just come out of some other country.

Same. People get way too protective over their information. It's not like William H Macy is printing it out, getting naked and rolling around in all your info. And even if he was, it still doesn't affect you.

"Try explaining to your grandmother the different between a Wii and a Wii U and watch her eyes glaze over."

Where's the Chrono Trigger?

Agreed. Photoshopping the head of Google to make him look like a demon is really low-ball. Fox News doesn't even steep that low.

I don't really get all the Google hate lately coming out of Gizmodo. Lately it's like Giz has been trying to get people to quit Google for Bing due to a few minor grievances. It's like if you got married, enjoyed 10 years of a great relationship, then you suddenly noticed that every once in a while she talked with her…

Gawker is just butthurt because a couple of writers had to chick an "opt out" box of a feature they didn't like. They're grow up soon.

Couldn't you have used a demo vid that has less obnoxious people in it? D:

I understand his frustration, but switching search engines in response to this AND telling your large reader-base to follow suit is a bit overkill. It's like if a hockey team was going for the Stanley Cup, did great throughout the entire season and lost during the last game and he suddenly stopped supporting the team…

Takes less clicks to opt out than to change your search engine. Sounds like Mat's just being spiteful. Telling people to switch their search engine because you don't like a change that you can turn off is just bad journalism. Gawker is really going downhill.