If this is Lane Bryant, likely not.

This would solve many a problem

That or have some sort of guide with “these are the brands we carry that go from 16-24"

It sounds like a very logical reaction

At first glance I literally thought it was a sequel to Sweet Home Alabama.

Would agree to all of this but she needs to cash in her chips with ALL of her friends now. The amount of support needed when a newborn is in the house is so key here. I agree it shouldn’t be this guy but it needs to be someone. Like straight up if all her friends are like “duh... leave him!” they need to be willing to…

Married for 4 years at the end of this month but my first marriage lasted.... 6 months? Almost two years if you count from “I do” to my divorce party. So I think I’m doing pretty well on that score!

Ditto - seeing a movie means spending between $60 - $140 depending on if we can con some poor sap into babysitting on a Friday night. So if I need to fork over $140 for a movie, I need to *reeeeeeaaaaalllllyyy* want to see it or *REEEEEEAAAAALLLLLYYYYY* need a night out.

Making sure you have a full tank makes sense - hording gas doesn’t unless you have a generator and plan on making a go of it.

Of course it is. I’m not saying that at all.

Well the theory only holds up when there aren’t other things to consider - like social standing, cultural pressures and higher cognitive levels. I mean small feet - who would think that has an attractiveness value that is tied to evolution? It doesn’t and yet foot binding was an East Asian practice for centuries.

Also, what you are likely referring to is that evolutionarily, women are deemed more “attractive” when they have larger breast because it’s an outward signal that they are capable *of feeding offspring* which yes, is attractive to anyone who wants to continue propagating the species.

I really need Antifa or whatever to *actually* organize and have a charter or something - They are hard core mother fuckers who are willing to defend against bullshit but yes there are some that come to start shit. They need to make it clear that going on the offensive physically is not what they are about.

Ahead of the game!

Thanks!

I mean there is the theory that wide hips and large breasts are a signal to men that those women are more “attractive” because they outwardly look like they are better at bearing children and feeding them to the point they are strong enough to fend for themselves.

There are much better ways of putting it like...

She’s actually exactly like Paris Hilton or Ivanka Trump. Daddy bought an old ruin and revamped it to be a luxury hotel. He’s a property developer. All of them are nouveau riche in that their riches go back tops 3 generations. These are not people who were part of the aristocracy when aristocracy meant something.

It was just GHASTLY

Yeah it only took the first fix to make me realize that I DEFINITELY DO NOT WANT FLORALS and adjust my preferences accordingly. Last one was awesome!