It's not apolitical. It's a fluff piece like other Gawker media articles on this conflict.

What a load of garbage, pro-Israel garbage at that.

All you have to do is look at past Gawker media articles on this conflict.

It was a rhetorical question, douchebag.

That's right I am incapable of sympathizing with colonists and people who are the Masters to the Slaves in this power dynamic.

Oh fuck off you snake.

BULLSHIT.

This is not an apolitical article.

It's not a matter of 'most recent' atrocity or me beginning the time-line of events when I feel history 'begins'.

Much of the world does not see that to be true. If it did it would be irrelevant to me.

I could care less about what Arabs and Muslims want to do but cannot because of the political realities of their daily life.

ya this is what I was referring to:

nah, i was responding to a post that said something like :

sure you have

If you search Gawker media, the only kind of Israel-related threads are usually fluff pieces or soft propaganda (like the Maxim story with hot IDF chicks).

chasing tornados is darwinism (and trolling)

What dialogue?

You are clearly an ignorant pro-Israel douchebag.

Less dogshit and more substance.

So in other words, you're an ignorant troll with nothing to add to the discussion.