Did you add them, or do you have a brand new model?
Mockylock
Mockylock
Not sure about the logic in this. Have you been to WV or Texas?
Subaru bros. Seriously. Subaru bros. No, I shouldn't have bought a car that'll done blow'd up the second I forget the check the oil at a trackday. Nope nope nope nope go away nope. "Subaru" is not always the answer for many, many fantastic reasons, and the royal pain of getting to simple parts around the engine is…
Maybe they're saying that molten tires didn't meet DOT standards.
o_O... how much travel does an Aston Martin have... and when is the last time you used tie downs with another car on top? Not to mention, the front/rear of the top car is resting on the others.. and the wheels are hanging.
I wouldn't put that off the table. In the morning and on the internet, I'd say I probably really know about 15% of what I rant about. Sometimes I just black out. So, I probably deserved a little of that.
According to the survey, 53 percent of drivers polled can't stand it when people are tailgating them and 47 percent say left lane hoggers drive them up the wall.
Or they're just not anal, presumptuous, and have fewer fucks to give than your average internet English teacher's assistant.
We're researching some other aspects of the Rezvani story currently, but at least their PR guys can take a bit of ribbing, which is never a bad thing.
I think "Best-in-class" needs some refinement. Any time they mention it, it's always followed by what class. Safety, value, performance is what they usually get, but the "Class" is usually blurry as well, because the "Class" they're talking about could be AWD sedans under $30k. So, "best-in-class" is pretty…
There's nothing that really stands out for the other ones. The problem with the other 3 will have with being an "alternative" is that you can't replace the WRX when it comes to the Subaru community that loves their cars. It's not just about performance or specs. The majority of people who own a Subaru, tend to…
Exactly. People will pay for performance, especially if they see numbers that are competitive. Mitsubishi sold boatloads of EVOs to the same crowd, when they were nearly 15k over the STi. There's a reason for that.. it ran way better after modifications and didn't become unstable after 400whp.
Depending on the options and performance, if they kept it below $35 it would fall around the WRX, STi, Mazdaspeed area.
I have no idea why you brought up the caliber. JimZ brought it up for another reason, but I was a bit confused by that. I don't like to even think about that atrocity.
It doesn't matter what anything has in common with the next. The size and demographic is what they're going for. Regardless of show shitty the Neon was, it SOLD. The Caliber was a glorified new-age PT Cruiser with a few changes. Now you've got a new car that they CAN'T call a neon, that's practically the same…
Yeah, that massively selling vehicle called the Caliber. I mean, it outsold the Neon by millions... and for like a massive 4 years. Ya know.. the Neon only did it for.... 10? I loved the amount of SCCA racing and ACR models the Caliber threw on the track.
I see your point, you're SO right. Dodge didn't have…
I'm just saying that I'm sure people will buy the shit out of it anywhere from $26-32k, if it has the numbers. If they can pull off 260 in a small frame with better handling, people would love to buy it.. especially since the Evo is gone and there aren't a ton of competitive AWD light runners left. They're really…
I'm quite certain the Dart has more in common with the Neon, than it does with it's own name's predecessor. The Neon name was old, and regardless of what fans feel, I'm sure Mopar felt it was time for a replacement under a different name.
Ohhhhhhhhh.