Then so be it. I’m scum. I’ve been called worse, and I embrace the fact that I’m an asshole. I, however, have a socially redeeming value to society. You? You’re a middleman peddling someone else’s wares, and your profession exists only because of constant lobbying.

Sarcasm aside. You had the ability somehow. The disabled person in question can certainly own a car, however, they haven’t the ability to drive one. Ever. You rose above your upbringing and purchased a car. He can never drive a car. No. Matter. What. You cannot compare your financial wherewithal to a physical…

And I stick by that. Meet a car salesman who isn’t scum? You haven’t known them long enough.

I’m an attorney. I did the whole law school thing. I passed the bar. I can read a statute. Moreover, I’m well versed in arguments that pass muster in the court.

He falls under the ADA as it is by no fault or choice of his own, he is unable to drive. He lacks anything relating to choice. His suit is nothing more than him seeking a way for those disabled to have an option.

Prosecutor. I put bad people in jail. Yes.

The ADA doesn’t apply to able-bodied people who have not the funds, ability, of have lost their driver’s license. The assumption here would be he would have a license/car if he were sighted. Because of his disability, he does not, thus triggering ADA protections. I know its a stretch, but keep up.

ADA prevents that sort of thing. Perhaps you should read. I’m done with you - there’s a reason pro se’s get destroyed by attorneys. Every. Time.

The ADA doesn’t require one to use commercial options to partake in the business enterprise. Especially when he’s able to walk. Were he to be required to use uber/lift/taxi it would be for the sole purpose of going through the drive-thru, this would be prohibited under the ADA. This is the part that people have an…

Well, apparently you are more than just naive.

Why not hire a Taxi? Because the ADA doesn’t require you to spend extra money to do something someone else could l do. The ADA is about equal access. If a restaurant allows service for the able-bodied public, then they must also offer service to those with disabilities without charging extra, or requiring unreasonable…

It would be nice if you would understand the nuances of the suit before posting. I am an attorney. I somewhat familar with the ADA, but I am familar with the suit enough to know that he’s not asking for money. In fact, given the statute he’s suing under, he is precluded from obtaining a monetary judgement. The suit is…

Correct. It is not a lawsuit about money. In fact, he is not allowed to sue for money. What he’s asking for is a method to order, just like any other able bodied person.

It is indirect discrimination in that they’re only allowing access to those that are able enough to drive. Blind individuals represent a small portion of the population, but they should be able to order as much junk as someone who can see. (perhaps if they could see, they wouldn’t want to, but that’s another…

Seriously? I’ll assume you mean being in a car with someone else.

Same arguments have been raised regarding the ramps to get into raised buildings, or that have required elevators for new multistory buildings. They’re too expensive, we have to monitor them, the maintenance is a nightmare, we can’t properly monitor it, etc... They’ve all failed.

They don’t close the restaurant because of relative safety. You’re naive if you think that’s the reason. They have such staff because they’re trying to be frugal with their late night operating budget. The restaurant is closed because they don’t have sufficient employees to run the inside restaurant.

He walks or takes public transportation. Because he’s blind doesn’t mean he’s immobile.

Thankfully, Trump did not (nor you) have any hand in the ADA. Reasonable accommodations must be offered for all public enterprises.

If you’ve read the suit and related documents pertaining to it, you’ll note he’s not advocating for that or the ability to walk through the drive through. What he is asking for is the ability to have some method to order and receive the food. You’ll note that he’s not asking for money (nor is he entitled). He just…