They invited her back less than a year ago after she was ousted from her position at Vice for abuse.

Yet to see them give a free-reign article to a domestic abuser to claim he’s been unfairly persecuted as a piece of shit though.

If publish poor quality is enough to get fired then every EIC of Jezebel would have been sacked.

The article was genuinely bad from a quality standpoint and had no real value to be published. But if he was fired or asked to resign over that alone that is ridiculous. It’s a dangerous precdent to start firing people for push back on misguided articles. Next time the push back could easily be coming from the other…

So you’re admitting there’s no evidence, that an investigation won’t turn up any evidence, and everything is hearsay..Except it’s not even that, because she didn’t even tell anyone. So there’s nothing, and no point, and it’s a stalling tactic. Thanks.

The background check was already run. Nothing was found. Are you implying that the FBI was either negligent in their performance of their duties, in which case how do you reconcile the fact that they could be negligent in this investigation? You can’t. Every single sign now points to a delaying tactic or an attempt to…

They want the FBI to investigate an alleged crime that is not within the jurisdiction of the FBI, and for which the statute of limitations would have run out 34 years ago, and which took place in an unknown place and time, with no contemporary evidence.

Because an innocent man is being smeared as the left literally destroy their credibility and soul, doing something far beyond what the Turtle did as far as slandering an innocent man’s name and reputation with a false rape claim to keep a Supreme Court Justice from being confirmed?

I’ll say what we are ALL thinking: She knows she would be committing perjury so OF COURSE she won’t actually testify.

Well if Kavanaugh wasn’t a card-carrying member of the GOP before you can bet he will be by the time this circus is over. Make no mistake that’s exactly what this is. A circus. A person making a basically unfalsifiable accusation for the SCOTUS version of an October Surprise.

It’s weird to see progressives, who argue that it’s an injustice for employers to ask job candidates about past criminal convictions, come out on the side of denying someone a job based on a mere accusation.

Twitter simply needs to go away. Evidence: Trump is still on there.

Splinter "news" is a fkn joke. 

And it’s really fucking weird for them to be desperate! Even in the event of a blue tsunami that overtakes the Senate, they’ll still have the votes until January. There’s no rush. They could easily withdraw Kavanaugh and put forth one of the other names on that Federalist Society list to ram through. Surely one of…

You know what would be awesome? If this story mattered more than column inches and clicks, and that it had any effect whatsoever on the odds of him being confirmed.

How exactly would anyone investigate this? WHO would investigate it? The FBI already passed. So who? And what are they going to investigate?

I keep seeing this taking point from people I usually agree with, and I keep pushing back on it: The first lady to accuse Al Franken was a right-wing radio host. The next seven women to come forward were a Democratic aide, an elected official, a woman at the state fair, a female soldier, two unnamed women at…

I was referring to Paula Jones and others who accused him of assault.

Yet oddly they felt very differently when Bill Clinton was guilty of it. 

It has been reported that Kavanaugh cheated on a game of Connect 4 while in elementary school, also possibly knew where his opponents ships were in a game of Battleship in 1981..