Historical accuracy in a movie based on the Bible?

Meh, I'll still watch it, white-washed or not. The trailers make it look like it's focusing on the relationship between Ramses and Moses which - as somebody who's never been religious - has always been the most interesting part of the story to me. How strong is your faith, that you would turn against your own brother?…

I think it's sue-worthy without the race issue involved. You can't run a business like a sperm bank and go mixing vials up. Fuck them! How hard is it to match a vial sticker with a number and place it with the right people? Give me a break.

I've been giving her the benefit of the doubt, but after reading that the secret service let an armed man with a criminal record ride an elevator with the President, and her response was to let the person responsible for the screw up review it, I'm pretty sure she needs to go. Nothing to do with her being a woman…

LOL she'll be fired for being brought up through an agency that never taught her a better way to do things?

Where do you work/what do you do? I've never even heard the term "backup husband" until this thing, and you're apparently the guy for three different women? At WORK? Why are so many women that you know so concerned about multiple spouses? Spete. You made everything so much more confusing.

Barking up the wrong tree on that one, but I guess it was worth it just to break out that devastatingly hilarious line?

I've been told I'm the Backup Husband by three different women at work. I don't THINK they think I'm deeply in unrequited love with any of them, I think it's more of a "we get along well and have similar interests and there's at least a little mutual attraction" thing. They're definitely not expecting me to just not…

What are you talking about? I don't blame feminism for circumcision. I blame them for their role in the erasure of victims of it and the damage it causes, but that isn't a large part.

He has a fair point. Most sex articles men come across are about making men better in bed. It's all about "finding her g spot" and "giving her great orgasms." For guys reading Mens Health, the focus is very much on the female sexual experience.

That would be ideal, but I don't see why a magazine article like this deserves such a bitch fest.

Except this is about how the woman in the scenario isn't pleasuring to my standard, not the other way around. You guys keep missing this point, and you are proving my point that male sexual satisfaction is assumed.

That isn't what ad hominem means.

Why not respond to my points rather than a strawman? I have no problems with women's standards, I've made that clear. This is about someone getting pissy that men also have sexual standards.

Odd, considering that we seem to mostly agree here. The article is about sex tips for men because the article is *for* men. Not everything has to include women. I don't see anyone bitching about the sex columns here because they don't include men.

Ah, shame you couldn't post this comment to my comment thread in the other topic. It serves to illustrate the insular nature of the groupthink here, and the poisoning of the well IRT men's issues.

Just a personal anecdote about pepper spray. Make sure you aren't point blank when you spray it because the shit goes everywhere.

I have the feeling that you are thinking of either porn or sexualization of women (and men) in the media. I can't be sure, because you chose to respond like a child, sorry.

And they still say we live in this Patriarchy. Or that we ever lived in one.

The only good thing I saw in "Olympus Has Fallen" was a female secretary of defense and a female director of the secret service. But really, don't see that movie. Even my boyfriend who chose to see it wanted to leave before it ended.