Not until I'm jetskiing in Barbados with Rihanna.

I really, really doubts she cares that you don't approve.

That body makes me want to give up carbs and devote my life to Pilates. Hot damn, girl!

To every dickbag who defends these guys:

THIS.IS.RAPE.CULTURE.

Thanks for continuing to cover this, Erin. Great job.

"Detective Inspector Bruce Scott put it this way: "None of the girls have been brave enough (emphasis mine) to make formal statements to us so we can take that to a prosecution stage."

"It's not rape,. I had sex with one girl who is 13 when i was 16.. She wanted it and thats all that matters"

Agreed. And for sexual assault and rape survivors, even if they use the safe word and the touching/licking/groping stops, the damage is already done. It's extremely triggering. I think it's completely reasonable for a person to assume that signing a waiver agreeing to witness adult sexual content does not authorize…

My biggest issue with this is Kerr is suggesting that sexual assualt/rape is only violent. That if they're not cutting you or otherwise being physically aggressive it's not sexual assault. Which is wrong. Someone can grope me without a knife to my throat and it stills counts as sexual assault.

I understand the argument that you could just not go (as others in this thread have pointed out). However, I don't see the things described in this post as "boundary-pushing" of "uptight American attitudes." I see it as a confirmation that sexual assault is scary as hell, and that American women have good reason for…

They need to be more explicit about the sexual content. Graphic adult sexual content DOES NOT necessarily mean rape. It could be porno sounds, it could be a woman with her tits out, etc. if you're going to enter that kind of territory you owe it to your audience to make it abundantly clear that you will simulate…

I get your point, but if I was in the same situation and saw the words "scenes of [...] adult sexual content", I would interpret that to mean I might see some naked people or simulated sex acts, and that they may be violent/disturbing, but I would not think it meant some weirdo was going to push me against a wall and…

If I read "adult sexual content" on a release, I would assume: bewbs or simulated sex. I would not expect some rando to lick my neck or press up against me.

Thank you, this gets to what's really bothering me a lot here. The asshole sociologist is going on about Americans being sexually uptight and using this to explore our boundaries, but it seems like an extremely gendered scenario that is just more of the same aestheticized sexual violence against women, marketed as…

Do the male visitors get the exact same experience - groped by guy in tighty whiteys, etc? Very curious about this.

Without fully informed consent, that's not pushing boundaries; it's straight up sexual assault. "Some adult sexual content" is too vague to know that you're consenting to be groped.

No. This is completely crossing a line. What a horrible thing to do. "Americans are very uptight about sex" so they simulate sexual assault to push you to think about your boundaries? Fuck that. Unacceptable. This Margee Kerr person sounds like an unethical asshole.

I've started calling it "freeze peach" when people misinterpret it like that.

Then he just sat back and waited for the hot crotch to roll in.