Just because some people who work hard get screwed and some people who don't work get lucky doesn't mean working hard is a bad thing. Nor does it mean that working hard doesn't have a net positive effect on the people doing so.

This is mine. (Logitech G400) because

Nomination: Logitech G400. I use it. It's cheap at around $30-40. Nice black color, no flashy mumbo jumbo. Texture is rubber-like, NOT glossy like some SteelSeries mice. Glossy is just a fingerprint mess hazard. Warranty by Logitech is godly... my mouse was broken, and they simply mailed me a new one. I didn't even…

Freedom of religion means that Riot is free to block the word "satan" if they want to, which is what I find so ironic about the petition's wording.

Correct. Most importantly, the users signed the Riot EULA/TOS. Now they can argue that they are being discriminated against by not being allowed to say their Deities name versus other religion (which they are practically doing.) This again, can be nullified by the EULA/TOS.

Welcome to the real business world Games.…

Exactly. Claming this is blocking satanists freedom is as stupid as claiming games without chat functions block satanists freedom.

My thoughts exactly.

Exactly. Riot doesn't have to uncensor Satan because they aren't the federal government. Also, why would a Satanist be saying all of this stuff in a game anyways? It's not like LoL games are a good environment to start preaching religion or talking about politics, unless you want to troll. I also seriously doubt that…

1. You can disable the chat filter.

While I don't think "Satan" should be blocked, it's ridiculous to say Riot is "blocking their right to freedom of religion". As long as the government isn't involved, they have the freedom to worship Satan, and Riot has the freedom to censor it.

attention

Oh gosh, here we go again. "They are blocking Satanists' right to freedom of religion by preventing them from using the name Satan." No, Riot Games is under no obligation to provide "freedom of religion" to anyone. Much like freedom of speech, freedom of religion applies to the federal government attempting to deny…

All of which come back to the same situation: someone does not wish to, or simply cannot, buy something, and they feel they deserve to possess it anyway.

No, piracy happens when people feel they have the right to possess something they were unwilling or unable to pay for.

Actually, owning a house is an asset.

Most of us don't own houses. We hold mortgages. Mortgages are liabilities.

Why is enjoying your home/being happy with it and putting some thought into its future marketability/planning for your financial future mutually exclusive to you? My wife and I just bought our first house. We looked at a lot of homes, and of course "do we like it" was one of the main considerations in our decision…