MerricatTheExiled
MerricatTheExiled
MerricatTheExiled

No, it’s “BOI!”

And so it begins, when you no longer make games you must purchase those who can. I pray Valve avoids the same fate as the original EA and Activision.

When it comes to women’s rights and attitudes towards women, it’s obvious that the USA has a far way to go before things are ‘right’. However, when compared to most other nations it is also true that we look as if we are well past the ‘drug addled idealist dirty hippy communist’ peg on the dial.

No.

1. They do wash lettuce. As mentioned numerous other places - e.coli and other similar bacteria are small enough to hide/stick to places in the lettuce that washing can’t be guaranteed to remove all of it.

I’m not intending to be mean here but your nick is BotanistPrime, does it really need to be explained to you that food grown outside, exposed to nature, is susceptible to contamination?

I think a lot of people are forgetting that the current ‘pay for’ portion of the game was/is still slated to go F2P sometime in 2018.

So again, the story was semi-autobiographical. The boy didn’t get a job in the movie because the author didn’t get a job when it happened to him, they weren’t “passing a message” there.

Sister(s) and father. The actual author of the novel that the movie was based on - Akiyuki Nosaka himself passed in 2015.

And is pretty much beat for beat the exact same arc as Seita minus his ‘tormentors’ being of the same side as him.

You don’t need character development or ‘good characters’ (not sure what that is suppose to imply) to say something is a good movie.

That’s the same bullshit people used to explain why airbags were a ‘bad thing’ when they came out.

There is no need to be conflicted. Just educated.

Exactly how is that ‘impossible’?

Client/Lawyer privilege does not extend to planning to or committing crime, you can confess to your lawyer that you did it, you can not tell him you are going to do it or have them ‘help’ plan doing it. The latter two actions are not protected. At that point though, it would have to pertain to the matter in which the

Not if it was between Trump and someone else and Trump was asking him to record it - unless they were doing it in a state that requires more than one party in the conversation to consent.

Federal Law mandates either a warrant OR the consent of at least one party on the call. Hence unless a state specifically requires more - all states by default are “One Party” states.

It is _always_ the driver’s responsibility to maintain control of their vehicle, and till we have 100% autonomous self-driving cars, without a requirement for someone to be at the wheel ‘just in case’ enshrined as legal possibility, then it is still the driver’s fault for not maintaining control.

This isn’t an area I’ve delved deeply into, I wasn’t aware of Canada’s compulsory licensing for instance, however my understanding of the US scene is that there are _no_ laws compelling licensure to individuals who would like to show a movie, instead the industry has a number of organizations which sell, in essenese,

No, I say it like the music industry already lost their fight back before they were big enough to make noise over it. As far as I’m aware, there are zero laws on the books involving compulsory licenses for movies, if there were - Netflix would already have every movie in existence on in it’s catalog.