I thought I might be missing some next level pun. I was not, and I did not find it funny. I'm not sure why you need to comment on it.
I thought I might be missing some next level pun. I was not, and I did not find it funny. I'm not sure why you need to comment on it.
Yeah, no. My point was that in order to critique something — and when I said criticism, I meant things like art criticism, not a petty reply on Jezebel — you do not have to somehow "equal" the thing you are critiquing. The idea that someone who doesn't find a model attractive must only do so because they themselves…
Then the hilarity of the joke is beyond me! Carry on.
But...Old Country Buffet is already a thing. Definite article or not.
You've missed the point not once but twice. Cheers.
You do realize one can have an aesthetic critique completely divorced from their own aesthetic merit? Or do you not believe in criticism?
Totally! I would definitely spend that $10k on the assembly...or multiple private dinners with LB...
Actually, that's not true—it is 100% a matter of what formatting school you ascribe to (Chicago, MLA, APA, to say nothing of journalistic standards). Good try, though.
Seriously. I for one am shocked that the three associated writers are dudes.
Seriously! I like these people — why did they agree to be in this?
Wow, that's like some Medieval querelle de femmes type shit. But seriously, it's insane how this misogynistic rhetoric swings back and forth from "women are animalistic sluts" to "women are frigid and must be raped" over and over, across a span of hundreds of years. The fucked up thing is that what Rodger is writing…
That's just it. From the videos I saw, he gave off a distinctly creepy vibe—hollow eyes with no warmth or emotion expressed, just like his flat tone of voice. If he weren't clearly a fucking psychopath, he would have undoubtedly gotten laid. The irony is that a huge group of angry young men (who I'm sure are NOT all…
Please go park your teen angst in some other corner of the Internet. It's embarrassing.
What I'm wondering is, how many more times can you throw in "hysterical"? I'd like to see it at least three more times in the above paragraph.
Feminists are not in need of "allies" like yourself. There are plenty of men feminists who will not be (and have not been, since you seem to think this is the first time anyone is discussing this) "slowly turned away" by an honest, open discussion around misogyny. In other words: good riddance.
You seem to be coming from a good place, but listen: like reverse racism, there is no such thing as misandry. It really hurts your ally stance when you bring up what is a chimera, a distraction, and a non-issue.
But he's such a nice guy — won't anyone think of him!?
Learn how to read. What is wrong with all of you trolls that apparently never passed high school English class? Writers use rhetorical figures like hyperbole to set tone. Try Googling it.
as long as you don't have a dick it's A-OK.