@LoganSix: Heart click for the Married with Children reference.

@Cheeseslap spanks his ACR for being good: Of course! Why didn't I see it before, but anyway so long and thanks for all the fish.

looks like designers down under are taking more and more clues from nature.

I don't understand the meaning of this post, at all.

Surprisingly, not too bad. The car now looks like the truck that should have been.

@SLRSpeedshop: Wert has been alerted by his Jewish radar (Jew-dar if you will) and is inbound to ban us both.

What I'd like to know is what exactly could be done with the information stolen.

No Duesenberg?

@southernscrew: Oh God, I was just watching that movie, and you make me crack up again!

@mittelwerk1: Oh man this made me burst out laughing.

@Charlie Mullen: brought to you by Ford.

At that price, a winter beater with hints of SHO-ness that's also a wagon?

@Justin Hyde: First, thanks for replying. Next, you're right, BUT my point here was that the title of "took " Gov't money was misleading. This new government money wasn't asked for, but rather offered.

Those tail lights look stolen from a Lincoln concept, head lights from an Audi, and it's lost its uniqueness that it's sharp edges gave it.

There's a big difference between took and borrowed money Mr. Hyde. Many if not most of all the large corporations are borrow and pay back money, it happens all the time, nothing compared to "here, have some money to stay afloat" bailouts.

@Baby Benz is now a long-term beater:

@jdoubleh: I did do a double take when looking at it head on, but after walking around and above it, it was striking from the right angle

@iancoleTX: *booted out by Ray*

@jdoubleh: It's one of those "butterface" deals, 'cause it looks awesome from any other angle but the front.

@JackTrade: Of course I have to weigh in on this argument, because while it has a chip or two on its shoulders (fenders?), it's definitely going to be classic someday.