The reason might not be good (I never consider cynical marketing to be good). But if the result is good, that’s what matters.

You call this “grossest monster”? If you’re 10 years old, maybe.....

Well....... I know nothing about Australia so I can’t say if the rules of American entertainment apply.

I appreciate your naivety, but I think he didn’t decide to lower the cursing because he suddenly had a change of heart and realized the error of his ways.

America: where even a man’s nipples are considered kinky and sexual to the point one needs to make an article about them.

I figure you’re going to ignore any explanation because you don’t want to hear any explanation. You don’t want to accept something you don’t like.

Talking to a mirror, are you? *sigh* I understand you only want my attention. So I won’t give it to you anymore. Yap all you like, troll, but you’re ignored.

Uh... “he’s name”?

.....Really? I have to explain this?

This isn’t a blog, this is pretty much a magazine. People here believe the articles. And the writers make money writing them.

I’d hate to ever meet you. it’s dumbfounding to see your complete lack of understanding that you don’t have the ultimate knowledge of what is good and what is not.

Now that’s what I call good content, Kotaku: an article that was interesting and informative! Yes, it was a trivia article. But it was good content. Not the usual dumb clickbait and empty contents I see here.

It’s always existed and it’ll always exist. We need heroes. We need to IMAGINE heroes.

You’re angry at them killing themselves so you want to burn them down?

Half of the games you listed suck. The other half, I’ve played already.

Yes, Kotaku advertises some videogames and talks shit about others. In case you haven’t realized it yet.

What a compelling argument: “your tastes suck”. Ahahahah!

Honestly? I find nothing wrong with it.

You haven’t played Heavy Rain much, is it?

At my age, I don’t think you have anything to teach me about reviews and how to use them.