sort of? he’s a goddamn war criminal.

Saving money? Saving precious interior space? Again, for the vast majority of owners, they’ll likely never need the traction control button, so why waste space on it? Why waste money on it?

Yup.

This is my concern as well. I’d like to see the infotainment broken out separately somehow. How good a car is at being a car should be ranked apart from how good it is at being a smartphone.

Mainstream wise, this is probably the best choice out there currently.

Ok, maybe..... but $47,800 buys you one of these:

Stopped reading at “weight does not matter.”

Yes, and buy Ford.

Sorry, she’d bend over backwards to create protectionist regulations that unfavorably protected whatever special interest pays her enough.

Like so?

Must have been a mathematician somewhere in the generation process of your diploma.

To be fair, traffic to the Cascada site went from 6 people to 32 people. Percentages can be deceiving.

You’re aware that all of the Fiesta STs that folks rave about here are built in Mexico, right? Same goes for all of the hybrid/high trim level Fusions and the MKZ.

Thing is, for a daily driver, this is far more practical than a mustang or camaro. Extra space, actual usable back seat, and AWD. For a one-car owner who wants a fun and engaging car that is track capable off the floor, not sure this can be beat.

After I put that post, I realized that he was probably quoting the “all in” price, including TT&L.

Honor the presidents by buying a Lincoln the cars named after presidents

How is this even a debate? 350R. Flat plane crank, only slightly slower, but probably still faster around a track, and less concessions as a daily driver.

The transmission was the issue not the engine

I always figured there was a reason that Scion’s oval was the same exact dimension as Toyota’s.

His brain seems to be working fine while yours can’t figure out the meaning of “could”. Pure hypotheticals versus actual financial figures.