*insert crotchety old lady screeching “That’s not a Buick!”*
*insert crotchety old lady screeching “That’s not a Buick!”*
To be fair, I said 2005, not 1998. And it may look elegant and modern and swoopy and cool... but in reality it is just Playskool plasticky and junky and cheap. I’ve driven both the last gen Cavalier and the Bolt extensively, the interiors feel very alike save for the touch screen.
I think it’s because people see a price tag of ~$35k, then see the interior out of a junky 2005 Cavalier.
3 million sounds like a lot, until you consider it is less than 1% of this countries population.
Contacts are perfectly fine, safe, and comfortable if you use them correctly, and see an eye doctor regularly. I’ve personally lost contacts into the abyss above my eye but I can damn well feel it up there and took the time to gently fish it back out. It sucks, but it only happens once very few years.
Yeah why have a stable life when you could be stuck on the side of the road in your Alfa.
We should start sending him MORE hate mail
I dunno, figured a GSW wouldn’t be so messy. Call it a machete attack?
That was just from last night’s fatal stabbing.
This is cool and all, but it is easily 4 years too late to the segment. And that much torque is not competitive.
Let’s go back to Brands Hatch!
That describes pretty much half the current licensed drivers in the United States.
BUT THEY ARE PROTECTING THE CONSUMER
That’s where the wall comes in! YEE-HAW
EXTRA SPICY
Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh, lookitchoo wif your super unpopular opinion! Watch out folks, we got a hot take here! Better put on some oven mitts!
That’s not flying, that’s falling with style.
These days, what is the difference besides a bit of fiberglass and some back seats?
Wow, that’s a lot of miles on an original transmission for Chrysler.