For what it’s worth, adding an optional harder mode would I believe be increasing accessibility. Games that are too easy may not give enough dopamine for solving/defeating problems to keep certain gamers engaged, and user imposed artificial handicaps are not a great solution.

It was a nice reminder that I never set my Series X as home console (5 lifetime changes?), And was unable to do so with the service being down.

Since you already got the “honestly no one” answer, (and the follow up “why do it anyways” is unfulfilling,) allow me to give alternatives:

Betting on original beige Playstation, possibly roach infested.

If they’re added as part of the regular online subscription, then probably not. Likely for Nintendo’s liking they’d need to be standalone.

Yes, but they’re mostly self aware. Burned too hard by the hype nothing will ever satisfy them. Forever cursed to walk this world shaking their fist at clouds.

Nope, those are replacement tokens for that company’s specific next game, (something that could be done before without NFT, and therefore isn’t relevant). I’m talking about how the magic of NFT is that the original still have value despite the fact that the game they were made for no longer exists.

Nah it’s cool, some guy in a previous comment section said that if the NFT game goes down you can just take your assets and magic them into the next NFT game somehow.

I ended up dropping it early because it felt like for a character driven gacha game none of the characters you could pull actually felt like part of the story.

If the game isn’t out yet, it’s not the Best Grass in Video Games, presently now is it?

Wednesday night, still the most recent. Honestly I wouldn’t have known about the strike if not for the comments (guess I’m not gonna be back here for a few weeks).

Presumably it’s to prevent people from dropping asset flips mid sale.

28 days from launch if no launch sale
28+[sale duration] if launch sale

[Company With Occasional Hit]’s New Shooter is More [Boring Shooter] Than [Interesting Shooter], But Not in a Good Way.

Shortest answer: It’s a game NYT paid 7 figures for.

Existing IP law already covers digital reproduction. Making said reproduction into an NFT doesn’t fundamentally change that.

Split the difference.

I mean, they could have just... not?

I’ll raise you that while blockchain legitimately is impressive, NFT have poisoned the well to where we may never see a good implementation of it, no matter what could in theory exist.

Wouldn’t be surprised if they drop the numbering, like God of War (2018) and a million other games have in the last decade.