This was already covered on Gizmodo in 2013. http://gizmodo.com/these-are-the-…

Yeah, of course. There's real controversies, like how some people want to enact Jim Crow laws for gay people. Then there's what I like to call "Patricia Hernandez controversies", like how you aren't allowed to be a polyamorous transgendered asexual in the new Lego Batman game.

Same here. I'm 6'2 and at my thinnest (due to a medical issue) I was 123 lbs. My ribcage still measured 37" and I never got below a size 9, and even those were really snug. I'm now 195 lbs and a size 14 and still have a 37" ribcage. Perks of being tall?

Same-sex marriage YOLO.

This is a fun way to lose credibility as a journalist.

I have been reading Kotaku for a year or two now, and don't really pay attention to who writes what, I just read the articles and enjoy. Despite that, I have noticed in the comments section, a number of times, people railing on Patrica and thought... "Why would someone post just to be mean to or insult the author?"

She does in every article like this....every single article, aside from like, three, that she's written has been a complete pile of gender-biased bullshit. Everyone screams equality, but it's funny how men are always guilty, women are over sexualized in media, and every video game that comes out is an attack against…

It's also worth considering then that this is another article, written by you (of which there are literally many), that seemingly exist just to cause controversy and spout a complete, ridiculously feminist gender-biased attitude. You've done it in many previous articles, and I, as others, have spoken up before against…

Don't pretend to cite something and just point to another BS blog post that is absolutely non-scientific. EDIT: After reading what you linked to f-it. There's no hope anymore. Enjoy what you're helping to create. The number 8 doesn't even appear and oh my god what a POS 'article' by another 'journalist' framing the…

You're a fucking idiot.

The only things worth considering is how you came up with this logic and maybe that you should, perchance, live up to your headline and try to find a different way to respond to a rape accusation, rather than by simply implying guilt upon someone through statistics.

You're choosing the nice way of saying 92-99% of accusations are true. By saying that, you've pretty much stated, "Yep...chances are good he's guilty!" No proof. Nothing. Just statistics, which we all know are iron-clad, amirite? Congratulations. You've just made a perfect example of why real conversations can't…

This is seriously one of the most disgusting things I've ever read. I can't even grasp how you can actually say and post things like this without being sarcastic. Have you never heard of 'innocent until proven guilty'? How is it up to him to prove that he didn't rape her?

Way to distort the message.

That was the most disgusting comment I have seen yet.

Agreed Patricia's ignorant views caused me to make an account just to tell her how wrong she is to make this article. That should tell you something considering how annoying it is on iphone to make an account.

Your words will likely fall on deaf ears. Patricia uses the word rape pretty liberally as a smoking gun against men. I left my piece as well, but her past articles have me feeling like she's more sexist than anyone she accuses of such.

Feminists won't be satisfied until college students routinely exchange waivers before making out.

This statement makes absolutely no sense.