That's your opinion though, not some objective fact. I like FO3 way better than NV. I like KOTOR WAY better than 2.

Star Wars: Rebellion is a friggin awesome strategy game. If you've never played it, do so. Chock full of lore, planets, building ships, micro-managing, it's just great.

I would pay a lot of money for an HK-47 movie. Meatbags.

Yeah, they made KOTOR 2 and while a decent game, they botched the end of it. Fanboys will defend them and say they were rushed, but I don't want to hear it. Almost every game they do has some major flaw that ruins it for me.

KOTOR is still up there in my favorite RPGs of all time list, something about the story genuinely blew me away when I first played it. Usually the "twist" in a story is obvious or doesn't have a major impact when it arrives, but not in KOTOR. I remember my jaw dropping and being "Wha....?" for a good while after, and…

I said "ran" smart guy, and I didn't even edit the thing! It's right there!

You ran away the last time I spoke to you by claiming I was bothering you, despite you following me.

Don't bother, it was you (and the name is right above you, showing how bad you are at reading!) and now I know in what you said here and how you said it.

Thanks for outing yourself as that psycho troll I dealt with for a while. Don't even bother denying it, you are him. Explains why he vanished!

He was a redneck. WWF/WWE has a lot of redneck fans. Mystery solved!

Aren't they just going to return his to him?

Okay, I didn't say that was just solely the problem but I get your point. Prosecution dropped the ball regardless. Good day.

It would make it easier if they were able to prove 2nd Degree, but they were not able to and they didn't meet the standard they needed even for manslaughter. A stronger case focused solely on manslaughter from the start could have secured a conviction, IMO.

Their haphazard lateness with manslaughter to hedge their bets clearly failed, the jury needed clarification even to understand it. The point is, had they spent the entire case pushing for manslaughter and not 2nd Degree, they may have secured a conviction.

Cheering the verdict is stupid, but the verdict was pretty much what it should have been considering the prosecution's case. Had they begun with manslaughter, they may have gotten a conviction instead of nothing because they threw it in last second.

Yeah, the system is biased without a doubt, but there are a million examples and this case and that one aren't really the best examples of it (in terms of the verdict).

Anyone who watched the case unfold saw this coming, I'm guessing most people who're surprised didn't pay much attention to it.

The cop was at least busted in that one, albeit for way too short of a time.

No, they said he was not guilty of 2nd degree murder and manslaughter.

That's what happened though, and people are foaming at the mouth so insanely that stating that the prosecution got it wrong causes immense rage.