LaceratingSlyer
LaceratingSlyer
LaceratingSlyer

That's the kind of shitty thing, it's up for grabs. Unless you can prove you lost money due to a stolen credit card because of their security breach, you get at best two games. But that's only if you manage to get your claim in before $6 million worth of games is claimed by people. So anyone with a PSN account can

I'm not sure that doing right by the average consumer truly makes up for past mistakes of this magnitude. Having them do what they've done the past year or so (which is honestly nothing all that much to write home about) compared to having your personal and credit card information stolen can't really be debated. I

Calling people greedy only shows your lack of knowledge of the incident. Their network was hacked and account info (names, address, etc.) along with credit card info was stolen. You may not have been effected, but others definitely were.

Note that I only commented on complaints as rumors and nothing more and still fully intend to get the game. I've followed the game pretty closely and am only pointing out less obvious concerns that anyone else following would know, but people who don't follow wouldn't know. Anyone making those complaints who doesn't

This is what really concerns me about the game. They've been so adamant about showing how gorgeous the game is meanwhile there are rumors of their forums having quite a few complaints of physics on some cars just being terrible. It's hard to confirm or get details because the forums are locked to only people who

That's something I've noticed quite a bit lately following this game. It's something like over-saturated colors or something , but the game just looks fake. Don't get me wrong, it looks great, it's just in some lightning scenarios (primarily sunrise/sunset) the colors are way over the top.

The problem is you're using a bad example of Kickstarter for your argument that they need to change.

Again, a handful of failures - even major ones - won't instantly see a crash in Kickstarter supporters. Even now success is already so limiting on Kickstarter, yet that's not stopping from funding projects.

It should harm the image of these platforms, because that's the risk involved with them. It's still an alternative for gamers who choose to support games that are funded though, as a handful of failures doesn't instantly negate the websites validity. Including one recent release that could very well earn RPG of the

I can understand that completely. With the fast pace of the game I don't expect much commentary to be more devoted to explaining the situation. However, later in the video they do manage a much better overall job of pointing out the situation than they did at other points when they decided to smack talk instead. If

Of course I do, especially when that commentary explains what's going on so the average viewer can understand. But when you get something like what goes on in this video for the first minute or so with the commentators doing the trash talking, it gets a bit juvenile and makes me want to turn it off.

I admit I'm not much of a fighting game fan, but I could understand what was impressive with this. However, the commentary was just terrible at points. At the end it wasn't so bad to hear them actually explain what they're doing in game, but a lot of the non-explanatory comments were just juvenile and interfered with

Is it just me, or do the commentators talk like they're in a Mountain Dew commercial? Does this really appeal to people? It's pretty ridiculous and I was forced to mute the video to watch it.

While it's impressive looking, I think the artist missed the point of the original suit's design. I think it's original design is more to reiterate that Gordon's just a 'normal' scientist and not some space hulk that we normally get in FPS games.

I'd argue the opposite. The only way vanilla and BC was tougher was in how guilds had to manage raiding (due to attunements, resistance and dps gear checks), and then it was only tougher on the guilds who weren't in the top spots on each server. I can see how the raiding community was "better" then, but I think that

I think your comparison of Batman is a great example of a series done right though. The primary difference is that with Transformers instead of becoming a smarter, more believable character (not just in character design, but real world believability of it being actually possible), it just became more outrageous and

I think that was a design decision that gets overlooked by critics because of how much more there is to criticize in the movies. I agree with you completely though, instead of making sense as to what goes where when they transform, they just mesh pieces of metal together because it's easier. Sure certain body traits

And my point is that a dating site is only going to show you the tip of the iceberg in terms of what women have to deal with in dating. There are dozens of other reasons why women have it harder dating (most of them are mentioned in this article), and you claiming that men have it equally as hard because women don't

The point being that you think you understand what it's like to be female based on limited internet interaction on a dating site?

You having a fake profile pretending to be female does not nearly come close to equating to you understanding what it's like to actually be female.