LaceratingSlyer
LaceratingSlyer
LaceratingSlyer

First of all, the legality of the game isn't an issue. Secondly, if he were taking it down for legal reasons he could still be sued for whatever he made off the game before he took it down. So no, your speculation that he's taking it down for legal issues doesn't hold water. This has nothing to do with that, and

FYI, just because a company has a near endless amount of money doesn't mean things are guaranteed to get done on a deadline. Money does not equate into work being done and there are far too many limiting factors (most that we know nothing about) to try and attempt and say that these companies don't have an excuse as

That kind of attitude is half the problem with kids in the US, people trying to defend the parents and blame something else (video games for instance) for why kids do these sort of things. Parents need to take responsibility for their children and stop scapegoating irrelevant things as though it's out of their hands

"But simply leaving stuff on the sidelines for no discernible reason makes little to no sense. It's poor form."

Regardless of why you made the comparison it's inaccurate because obviously those features on a phone are much more important.

I'd hardly call the lacking features that they're adding in this update comparable to not being able to text or sync your phone. I don't disagree that these features should have been initially on the console at launch, but be a little more realistic about what these features actually are. None of these lack of

To be fair, I can appreciate a decent action/CGI film you can just turn your brain off and enjoy, but any of the Transformers movies are certainly not even worthy of that standard. They're not only bad, but they're done in extremely poor taste as though from the mind of a 12 year old that should be insulting to anyone

It's childish to promote and support being against harassment and making it known that it exists and people shouldn't be afraid to speak up? Are you serious?

The way you expressed it made it appear as though it's easy. I mean you literally say just write it off without even any suggestions as to how to go about doing so as though it's unnecessary.

You can't assume that it's so easily written off just because it would be easy for you. People have different experiences in their lives that effect these kind of things and how they react to it. With that, you shouldn't assume that everyone can deal with this sort of thing based of your life experiences. If you've

Apologies, misread your comment as though the game itself was in the first stages when they played it. I sure hope that's the case, though another preview ended up mentioning some difficult parts so that could be true. It still concerns me how unoriginal and just plain boring this looks even as a huge fan of the

If you honestly think there's little to no innovation in the industry at the moment I don't even know what to tell you. Look across all game platforms and you'll see plenty, from indie games to AAA titles that provide innovation that push the industry forward. I can honestly think of a dozen off the top of my head

It's not just about new IPs, it's about giving those new IPs a chance and putting funding behind it. Just because a game is made doesn't justify them as proclaiming they came up with a new IP. Especially when your primary system desperately needs one to differentiate itself from the other major consoles.

There are several previews up for the game stating the more specifics I got into. Several sites have reviewers who have had access to 5ish stages of the games and that's the impression they gave.

I think it's more the point that they're not being innovative in designing new IPs/game styles instead of just building upon ones they know that work. I can't blame them for that, as they manage to make Zelda's and Mario's that are truly amazing every release. However, why shouldn't someone be able to criticize their

Something, even the slightest thing that could make the game more than an HD remake? I mean even one minor new mechanic or some gimmick would at least make the game more than that. At this point it's a 20 year old game with new graphics that apparently has also been decreased in difficulty significantly - something

This one doesn't seem to do that though. In fact, this looks more like Yoshi's Island "HD" than a reboot. There's no innovation and nothing that varies from the old Yoshi's Island outside of graphics.

Is this what you guys are digging for in terms of content now? Instead of simply critiquing the game based on logic you start up flame wars not only between the consoles but with PCs as well, who had an inferior product to compare to in the first place. This drivel is hardly worthy of being written about but I guess

This is already getting to be a bit old of a discussion because of everyone only looking at the worst possibility of the scenario. There are way too many factors for the worst case scenario to happen quickly enough for it to matter (read: next 2-3 years) before regulations are imposed. There's too much competition in

The problem is what you brought up isn't relevant to what he's discussing. Seeing that scene in The Last of Us wouldn't be hindered if it were only in 720p. Nor would the scene from Bioshock if it were more blurred out after a certain distance that's unrealistic, but limited due to graphic performance.