No, then it's art.

My money is on Asami being more in charge in the relationship. :)

That's simple. Bi. :) She's had a crush on a guy, and on a girl. That rings as 'bi' to me.

Just be a good person. Don't stick up for people because they're black, or Asian, or whatever. Stick up for people because it's the right thing to do. The other thing I can think of is - let them speak up for themselves, and if they need help, help them. But it is their fight, and all we can do is be there when…

And you could still do breeding and training for PvE, rather than PvP. But if everyone is doing PvP matches with maximized attributes anyway (through legitimate action or cheating), then it becomes almost moot to have to work up to that for PvP.

What I meant was, have your normal Pokemon, breed them all you want. If you go to battle another player, the stats inflate to 'maximum', for that battle. When you leave the PvP, they revert to normal. I think that would do wonders for resolving cheating when it comes to actual PvP and tournaments. That way, people…

You know... when you go to do online battles, perhaps they should just have it so your Pokemon automatically have maxxed attributes. Then all that matters is what moves you have. Do this, and there's no reason for anyone to cheat. You've got your moves, you've got your maxxed stats, everything else is tactics.

Personally, I want to see FF VI done with the FF XIII engine. Gods, FF VI with modern graphics and game play would be epic.

I never understand these people. If they want to run a business open to the public, why can't they accept there's going to be clients they won't agree with? If they want to refuse people, don't run a business open to the public.

I've sadly had to put four cats to sleep in the last sixteen years, and it has been heart breaking each time.

Quite possibly. And that might be something for someone else to do an essay/blog/videoblog about.

It would be off-screen, just like him with the women. Fair's fair. ;)

It takes more than six months to make video games, we'll see what comes out next year or so. But yes, with games like The Last of Us, we may see a shift. Actually, Guild Wars 2 is an excellent example of where games may be going - I just finished writing about that.

Women now make almost 50% of the marketplace. That's significant. And even the guys who made GTA actually agreed Anita Sarkeesian had a point, and they were going to keep it in mind with future games, so large companies are starting to pay more attention. This is a Good Thing (TM).

But not victims, that's the difference.

No. I believe there should be a balance. Instead of having the vast majority of victims be female, cut it closer to a 50-50 split. This isn't an 'all or nothing'. This is wanting a balance.

*grins* I know, right?

Perhaps, but what would be gained by dragging this out longer than it has to be?

Exactly. :D

Yes, you could get the money, but no, that doesn't mean you have the skills to create the games - and you shouldn't be expected to. You can crowdsource the money to get the instruments to make a song - doesn't mean you've got the talents.