And Jonathon Quick had a .945 save percentage with a 1.55 GAA. When’s the last time that got you swept in a playoff series? Poor bastard.

When were Red Sox fans ever plucky? They just went from miserable and insufferable to miserably insufferable.

do you mean that I shouldn’t have sent my credit card number to tht email from hypebeast.net?

Microsurgery’s hella expensive tho.

It may involve “sanctity of the game” and “unwritten rules”.

are you sure it wasn’t “Sweep the leg!”?

Agreed, but I’m tired of my tax money going to this sort of behavior by the police force. Isn’t it time we privatize BRS? I’m certain the market can do a far more efficient job for us. /s

I agree with I Trust Dr.Rahmani (though personally I’m more or a Dr. Tayfor man) and would like to point out, as far as the Nassar debacle, it’s important to acknowledge that the primary victims were athletes. To have part of the punishment be to get rid of athletic programs themselves seems like a ham-fisted…

Wow, testy. You should try and remain a little more disinterested. It’s less stressful.

compliment, not complement

You never know. Maybe Bayatpour was using disinterested correctly and was implying she looked neutral, above the fray. Perhaps he was trying to complement her professionalism. I think a newsperson should aspire to be disinterested to some degree.

So what happened? andanyway? I can see why you might think about grilling steaks, but why were you also thinking about blowing through a stop sign?

Two Questions

I’m perfectly fine having a few dumbshits arrested if it keeps the rest of them from making jokes like this. I don’t really want to wait behind an innumerable line of funny guys making bomb jokes. Just how fucking idiotic do you need to be before it’s an arrestable offense? You draw the line, you make no exceptions,…

Careful - he’s one tough nerd, you know!

I wonder what this MAGA crowd would say when faced with the fact that about 1/3 of their beloved team is made up of job-stealing immigrants?

No argument there -

You’re not following. Under the present system a regulation win is worth a total of 2 points. 2 for the winner and 0 for the loser. But a game tied at the end of regulation is worth a total of 3 points - 2 for the winner and 1 for the loser. In a 3 point system the total stays 3, either 3/0 or 2/1.

Misheard? More like a case of selective hearing, don’t you think? 

Yeah, I get that. I was calling out Petcheskey for how he seemed to be whining like a tiebreaker game itself was the amateur part of the equation. And, really, any tie breaking scenario should always end with some active way to settle it - game, dice roll, etc. A final either/or that can’t possibly be a tie. Hell, the…