Kanji
Kanji
Kanji

Fail at arguing? I've debunked practically every single word you've stated and you've countered none of it. Are you delusional? It's 2 very clear points:

My point is, you're entirely wrong about A.) this cosplayer in particular, and B.) cosplay, as a whole, being "sexed up." Even if a person enjoys showing off their body, more times than not, they'll pick an appropriate character to cosplay as. You accused cosplay of being "sexed up", but you can't really "sex up"

The bigger the community, the "worse" it is. That's why you generally hear about great communities in lesser known titles while games like WoW and CoD are known for their awful user bases. Granted, there is some correlation between a game's accessibility (CoD and WoW are very "easy" games to get into) and attracting a

Some people like cosplaying as a character of the opposite gender. There's nothing wrong with that. Likewise, superheroes wear skin tight outfits. Apparently you've forgotten that, so here's a picture to remind you of who she's cosplaying as. This isn't a character that's been "sexed up" or made slutty. It's a pretty

But it IS about fans dressing up as their nerdy obsessions. That's EXACTLY what this is. This girl is a nerd. She enjoys cosplaying. Just because she was so damn good at her hobby she made a career out of it does not change that fact. Back to the pro-gaming analogy, this is like you saying, "I miss when gaming was

If I play a game for fun, happen to get really good, and then get recruited into professional e-sports because of it, that does not make it a business investment or professional endeavor. It means I did something at a hobby, the public responded well to it, and I was able to turn it into a career. That's a far cry

You do realize the very definition of the word "wasn't" is past tense right? Meaning that when she started, she wasn't a professional, but merely a hobbyist doing exactly what he described.

Because A.) the UI is very, very important in MMOs, and B.) the old (current) UI is an abortion. Square tried to design a single UI that would work on both consoles and PCs. However, since it was meant to be used by both control schemes, it ended up not being optimized for either, thus controlling poorly whether you

Vampy is a nerd chick who did exactly what you just described. The only difference is, she's hot and really good at making costumes, so she started making an income from it. She wasn't a professional model or costume maker who decided to exploit cosplaying as a means of income. In fact, most of the "famous" female

How can you in any capacity consider them less fun when they offer more variety in every conceivable way? Look at Mordecai vs Zer0. Zer0 can do everything Mordecai could do - save for Bloodwing (who was largely useless, so not a significant loss). In addition, he can stealth and melee. He can be good with weapons that

I disagree. With the exception of Lilith, all the original classes felt like lame shooter archetypes. Soldier was Soldier, Zerker was Heavy, and Hunter was Sniper. They did nothing interesting or original that I hadn't seen in a dozen shooters before. Bloodwing and Berserk were interesting abilities, but hardly gave

Sports are about competition and competition is motivated by succeeding. It's not about bragging rights (ego or "e-peen" - what a stupid term); It's about succeeding and being incredibly skilled and proficient at something. And I mean, yeah, confidence comes with that, and obviously you're proud of your

To some people, winning and being the best IS fun. In WoW, my guild was one of the Top 5 in the world. We smashed our heads against a wall for ages to become the best in the world not because there was money involved, but because being the best of the best is how we had fun. Seeing your guild's name on the kill

As you said, Politifact also doesn't cover all statements made throughout the debate. NPR has a much more comprehensive list and Romney clearly comes out on the bottom:

First off, speak English. Your poor grammar almost makes you not worth replying to. Secondly, this whole "who won, who lost" debate is based purely on charisma and how they carried themselves; not the actual information either one provided. Hence my point. Romney "lost" because all he did was spew lies for 90 minutes;

Name the lies he told? See, this is the problem. If you weren't politically ignorant, you'd have noticed them during the debate and this wouldn't even be a matter of contention. My jaw was on the floor most of it because nobody was calling him out on the fact that he was literally making up bullshit every second of

Not according to Obama. According to independent, non-partisan studies. According to fact checkers who have no motive or agenda for either side. According to science and logic. I know those words are difficult for conservatives to understand, but it's not about bullshit, rhetoric, he-said-she-said, or any matter of

How do I know he was lying in the debate? Because there are facts and evidence that point to such. This is not a matter of opinion. He's not lying because *I* think he is. He's lying because the words coming out of his mouth are not the truth. Look what he said about his tax policy. Even Obama straight up called him

I am criticizing Romney, not praising Obama. Get your head out of this "us vs them" dichotomy. I just find it hilarious that Romney "won" when all he did was go on stage and spew lies. Not exaggerations, not extending the truth, but straight up lies that have no basis in reality whatsoever. That doesn't mean Obama is

By your logic, Edison is more important than Tesla.