-> This made my pissed when I saw it...

Cars need not be directly comparable for a jalop to have a preference.

...he was pointing out that it's a useless comparison.

V6 Mustang vs. anything else. It's like saying "I can reduce this to an argument in which the 0-60 time of that car is bested by a lumbering rental car, and therefore the lumbering rental car is better."

Top Gear compared a 40k Camaro SS to an 80k AMG and decided that the AMG was better.

I'm just saying that there is turbo lag, it is tiny, but its there. You lose credibility when you say a turbo motor is more linear than an NA motor.

That they let a Miata park in the men's section of the parking lot?

I'm pretty sick of all this Crown Vic nostalgia. It was a lousy car. It wasn't any good at turning, and it could even bring on bouts of car sickness in a relatively straight line. It wasn't fast, it wasn't quiet at high speeds, it wasn't made with nice materials or tight panel gaps, it was thirsty at the pump. As far…

Except that the UK still uses miles.

Matt, seriously, stop getting a jealous hard-on every time MT is mentioned. The only thing that is actually relevant in this article is Gilles, Pobst, and the Viper. Yet you can't help but toss in accusations that this whole thing is caused by MT's "trolling" or lack of integrity, as if they told Pobst to slow down…