KamikazePigeon
KamikazePigeon
KamikazePigeon

When I'm not bombarded with 50,000 pictures of people's faces, I enjoy seeing the occasion posts from "TheCarPix". They claim they take all their own photos, but I'm unsure how true that is.

Regardless, the photos are stunning and far better then the norm of food and faces.

Instagram.com/TheCarPix

I'm gonna go the other way on this one.

I was a firm believer no car is 100% awful in every way. and every car has it's positives.

I believe the Youabian Puma is awful in every aspect I can think of.

If I made this list, this would be my number 1.

I despised Tesla, especially with the influences of Top Gear and it's range debacle. Over the last few years, I absolutely love what they've done with the Model S. At first I was iffy on the notion of buying a "half-finished" vehicle and participating in essentially

That's true, excuse my choice of wording.

That is insane! 166mph on just human power! It makes sense though, the greatest force stopping you from achieving quicker speeds is resistance from the wind. The friction from the bike itself is extremely small in comparison come to think of it.

Thank you for the history

I need to know more about this photo! That bike must be insanely quick!

Jalopnik's Engineering Division at it's finest.

I see two options here.

A)
1. Hoon Audi
2. Proceed to hoon Manual Ford Aspire
3.Write amazeballs article about how amazeballs the manual Ford Aspire is at the limit.

B)
1. Take some fast-acting, experimental laxatives the night before for additional spending money so Jalopnik can pay Nibbles.
3. Take Massive deuce just

Ah, ah, ah ah, ah!

So much music in the monitors.

I've been loving these Traffic Jams lately. I'm debating whether someone hacked my music folder.

I'm watching you Mr. Hardigree...

In terms of design, the D Type is still extremely symmetrical despite it's exterior appearance. The fin did help with aerodynamics. But if you take a look at the suspension and its underpinnings, it's very much so symmetrical for the most part.

No vehicle is 100% symmetrical of course but they make it as close as

To add to your point, during the design process, mirroring a part in a 3D modelling program is far easier (only a few mouse clicks) rather than redesigning a whole new part from scratch for the opposite side.

Another plus (albeit small) of a symmetrical design is that it makes easier for us CAD monkeys. It just makes

Now playing

I still listen to Shaggy frequently to this day. Another personal favourite is his version of Dance and Shout.

No that's fair. I stand corrected. Thanks for the heads up.

There are far too many great stories that I've read here. This is one of my favourites about calling out the BS product from Fuelshark:

http://jalopnik.com/the-fuelshark-…

I'm going to see if I can find some other ones as well.

I want one so bad! Just the song and the adjustable height sold me.

Just yesterday, NASA approved what is essentially Capt. Torchinsky's design to be used for a new module. And now we are graced with the Great Sexy Mother of Sextopolis Sexy Halloween Costumes.

I lost my cool at Sexy ECU. The Sexy Turn Indicator is just too perfect.

If by chance, I get the opportunity to meet Jason in

I respect that notion. I find both the 308 and 355 extremely pretty as well. However, I feel that my love for the Maranello series is different, yet equal, to my love for the 355.

Ah, I stand corrected. I could be wrong. I just spotted this as a kid and I fell in love.

It was already half-way through it's life in 2004 but I'll put down the Ferrari 575M Maranello.

I don't know why but I adore it way more than I should.