The article's title is "Kid Got Expelled from College for Reporting a Security Problem to School Officials".

Gonna have to say I disagree. And the actual article points it out quite clearly.

Gonna agree with Justin, as a ref for 3 years (and a player for 10), if the ball is the first point of contact, it's almost always clean. After all, he could have simply tripped (or injured) himself when contacting the ball. As a defender, you pretty much need to depend on this stuff.

The 2003-2004 block also seems to include the doctor Serial Killer Harold Shipman. The world will never be safe. :)

well, if we tack in the following years according to the bbc: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18900384, they're at record lows. And this goes all the way back to the 1980s.

With the original post being gone, there's really not much to debate or discuss anyways. I'll agree to disagree. The article was indeed helpful, I just wish it hinted at some alternatives to the norm in certain aspects. I agree though ,that LH should keep writing articles like this. And calling out people for having a…

Wouldn't it be unfair to say that "Unreal" used 100 mods on his game?

I think the point that he's trying to make is.. the tone of the article indicates that you felt different. But he, I, him, nor anyone cares. No one cares. You're not supposed to care. It's definitive opinion, not open debate.

I can understand that. What I did, was I took my PC, plopped it in the computer room (other side of the house), ran HDMI over Cat6 to my receiver, and connected the TV to my computer.

Wasn't this awesome? I mean, it gives you so many perceptions. The video is only 2 minutes long and you can see how far away it starts. You can also see it just sort of looks like a bunch of rain when it's approaching, and then vavoom. Much gusto to this guy, for being brave (or ignorant?) enough of the approaching…

I'll incline to agree. The game is fun, I find a ton of enjoyment in it. But every time I run into a frustrating glitch the game goes off. Which means I still haven't passed chapter 8.

As someone else who works in QA, I'd like to point out he's quite correct. There sure are a lot of weird and bad glitches.

Not that I disagree, if a law is broken the law can't really be upheld. But does anyone else find it interesting that individuals cannot use evidence that clearly labels guilty actions, regardless of the source?

I mean, it could. But then again the risk is exactly the same regardless (once he has your money he has no use for you anymore other than to be an eye witness to the crime that's been committed) which then leaves you back in the same predicament of "is your life worth the risk".

Or worse yet, if he called it as soon as the infielder camped under it, there was no way he was "easily obtainable", it was within a half second of it smacking the ground, and if you pause it, the ball is actually closer to the outfielder than the infielder.

It is depressing when a Foundation whose sole purpose is to better educate and attempt to cure a horrible disease denies a company that has done no heinous or criminal acts to offer help specifically for said horrible disease.

It is nice that we do remind people hat it is real without sexualizing. The problem is that people are being reminded about their worth is only because of a fundraiser? It's not like this service did not exist prior to the promotion. It was of no deal then, and it continues to be no deal afterwards. So why the focus…

Their campaign should not have any sway on how you feel about being sexy. Because boob or not, you are who you are. If you run into someone and the only reason they're talking to you is because of 2 bumps on your chest, you should probably consider them not exactly your type.

To be fair, my assumption was that the rules of a "catch" require possession. The rules of Possession state that if two individuals simultaneously catch (actually, if there is the slightest indication of it), that it is considered simultaneous and as such, there is no possession (Rule 2... something). If there's no…