Junior4565
Junior4565
Junior4565

Well looking at it this way I’m glad we have the superdelegates to offset a Trump radicalization. Actually I think that what the establishment want to defend against a radical candidate meaning Bernie. I wonder if there is any history of this happening before with a radicalized candidate and did he make it to the

But doesn’t the electoral college picks where the votes go? I think that why because the electoral college is just a mess and then gerrymandering really helps to skew the vote. So we can win off of the popular meaning more democrat senate seats but the electoral college don’t go based off of popular votes.

OH so I see what you’re are saying if one candidate had 2 points over the other the delegates would have to follow that right?

I feel the Dem base would be easy to unite I mean both candidates say the same thing. Clinton is just more corporatist and Sanders populist. I feel that the republican base is so fractured right now that if Trump gets nominated the party will either set in stone Trump ideals or self destruct. Progress is coming look

I wouldn’t think Sanders would disagree about a down-ballot initiative but Bernie fighting the underdog fight where he putting all his effort towards the nomination he doesn’t have the same clout of endorsements as Hillary does. In endorsements from the house and senate are any indicators then Bernie would have to

If Superdelegates listened to the people there wouldn’t be such a difference between the two. Hillary has 56% to Bernie 44% in pledged delegates but Hillary have 94% of superdelegates so who is representing the people at the moment?

If Sanders really come through with his message then there won’t be no reason to tell them to donate when he can just tell them to vote. Democrats are always favored with high voter turnout.

if it was just for name recognition then that’s fine and all but most people vote by party straight anyway so if you’re on the Democratic side and voting you would vote for every Democrat you see running`on the ballot. The idea of tying those names to herself before she even secures the nomination is a slap to the

Rationality exists on both sides. I really think the divide started to fester when the Bernie bros moniker stuck and then it evolved. I mean when one side dismissed the other over sexist themes(which do exist institutionally and needs to be discussed but not used to chose a candidate) and from the other side because

If the rumors are all true right? Anyway Bernie supporters are diverse just as Hillary’s supporters are. They want a complete overhaul of the system while Hillary wants moderate steps in the right direction. A lot of his supporters were most likely going to vote Hillary to keep a democrat in the president seat but

Well most likely in the general people that vote will be voting by party lines, while down ballot is really important to mid terms. The name of Hillary for Victory just screams to some that this is about obtaining general election support through a celebrity approved dinner. If it wasn’t happening while the democratic

Now you say Democrats are progressives but during the midterm season Lundergan Grimes had a shot at unseating McConnell but her whole campaign she was being the least progressive candidate just to get elected even fumbling over if she voted for Obama in re-election. Of course we need those bills passed with a control

Right it was to win them over when she cancelled appearance at a fundraiser for McCaskill over a remark she made. To be honest just cutting money from a candidate is essentially akin to ruining them in the upcoming election that how most republican fundraise. Speaking of McCaskill she criticize Bernie a lot because

Well there is evidence of a Hillary Clinton political “hitlist” that was published about a two years ago. Here I mean that’s fair game they didn’t agree with her so of course they should expect no help. Now with all this money raised it’s not like it will be going to the most progressive candidate it most likely will

Well we don’t know what happened behind the scenes but Kojima probably was hard to work with. It’s seems like Kojima wanted a “Hollywood” presence and those don’t come cheaply. And to be honest out of all the games that could be made in the next en years Konami is still in a better position to make more games than

Most of Bernie supporters are young and it’s because of him that they are being vocal and politically involved this cycle. I mean if you really think about people were going to vote for her in the beginning before the contender Bernie Sanders came about.(Susan Sarandon is a good example) Remember all effort the

Eat some mushrooms and have a good easter...that what I would do if I was there

Yea an excuse to get stoned...and watch a horrible movie? Is a plus for easter.

Yea I was looking into subscribing to a magazine like Juxtapoz or Hi-Fructose because I like the art information in those and the price is justified with higher quality printing, well at least for me.

Yea the advertising on the front page is to make money from all the people that don’t buy papers and it’s even affects online publications from online and it’s becoming more desperate with native ads. People blocking ads is understandable but now it’s affecting journalism integrity to some degree.