Jonn
Jon W.
Jonn

I dare to disagree, only because I myself am a person from such a time period. I know there are some genuinely bad people, but it's the blanket-naming that makes this community horrible. I know you have pride in being one of the original people who played video games as a past time, but calling the rest of us children

How can anybody be rational at a time like this? The sky is falling.

Psst: no sentence that starts with "real gamers are" is a good idea

Ya strawman the whole amount of legit criticism to "People hate women in video games". Thats exactly what I expect from you people and then you wonder why people are gamers are legitimately concerned and angry. Just because a few bad apples did something group a whole bunch of people together, lets just ignore the

I definitely agree with this, she's not acknowledging any of the games which work against sexism. We're at a point where it will be more constructive to look at the games that are doing right and promote them instead of putting down the games that have been sexist. (Especially if you haven't completely done your

My solution is quite clearly in the post: "If she really does investigative journalism she should go into a debate with both supporters and critics of her vids but she wont. She should look at both sides of the glass but she doesnt."

See, this bugs me quite a bit. Back when she released her first video, I felt there were some problems with it, so, as best I could, I explained why I felt that way. People chose to take it as "concern trolling," and much, much worse. Her defenders, at the time, remind me of the same people who attack and deride her.

"You can keep playing ME3's version of the exact same pointless mode if it's that important to you."

Then you concede some people may actually want to do so, and thus multiplayer should be part of the game since some people want it. Especially when it has little to do with the quality of SP. So whether you like MP or

If ME3's version of multiplayer was exactly the same as another game, then it's a game I've never played. I realize a lot of games do have the co-op horde mode, but I do think this was a slightly different take on that, and therefore innovative. I also appreciated that they released a bare bones mode and then asked

Because it would require a group of friends dedicate hours upon hours to the cooperative gameplay, rather than sit down and have fun whenever. Also, it would either reduce most players to mere onlookers of the story, or create a huge mess where everybody votes for the story decisions. Neither is a good option for a

This is a problem these days- why does something have to be so over-complicated to be successful? If something it's fun, it's fucking fun damnit! That's what we play games for!

Please note that the entire post was not about the purported infidelity:

A brief note about the continued discussion about Kotaku's approach to reporting. We've long been wary of the potential undue influence of corporate gaming on games reporting, and we've taken many actions to guard against it. The last week has been, if nothing else, a good warning to all of us about the pitfalls of

I'm with you there, Black Market is a little bit on the nose. I'd prefer it they came up with some extravagant names, maybe the black marketeers could have a shared symbol so its easy to recognise. Something like J.T Willisher's Exotic Consumables and Sundries