I definitely agree with this, she's not acknowledging any of the games which work against sexism. We're at a point where it will be more constructive to look at the games that are doing right and promote them instead of putting down the games that have been sexist. (Especially if you haven't completely done your…

My solution is quite clearly in the post: "If she really does investigative journalism she should go into a debate with both supporters and critics of her vids but she wont. She should look at both sides of the glass but she doesnt."

See, this bugs me quite a bit. Back when she released her first video, I felt there were some problems with it, so, as best I could, I explained why I felt that way. People chose to take it as "concern trolling," and much, much worse. Her defenders, at the time, remind me of the same people who attack and deride her.

"You can keep playing ME3's version of the exact same pointless mode if it's that important to you."

Then you concede some people may actually want to do so, and thus multiplayer should be part of the game since some people want it. Especially when it has little to do with the quality of SP. So whether you like MP or…

If ME3's version of multiplayer was exactly the same as another game, then it's a game I've never played. I realize a lot of games do have the co-op horde mode, but I do think this was a slightly different take on that, and therefore innovative. I also appreciated that they released a bare bones mode and then asked…

You'd rather see something that is completely optional not go into a game when it effects you not at all? Do you care that a lot of us actually want it?

Because it would require a group of friends dedicate hours upon hours to the cooperative gameplay, rather than sit down and have fun whenever. Also, it would either reduce most players to mere onlookers of the story, or create a huge mess where everybody votes for the story decisions. Neither is a good option for a…

The ME3 multiplayer team was a different department, working in a different city, than the team working on the main game. In fact the multiplayer team kept creating new multiplayer content for a year after the last single player DLC came out.

This is a problem these days- why does something have to be so over-complicated to be successful? If something it's fun, it's fucking fun damnit! That's what we play games for!

Please note that the entire post was not about the purported infidelity:

A brief note about the continued discussion about Kotaku's approach to reporting. We've long been wary of the potential undue influence of corporate gaming on games reporting, and we've taken many actions to guard against it. The last week has been, if nothing else, a good warning to all of us about the pitfalls of…

I'm with you there, Black Market is a little bit on the nose. I'd prefer it they came up with some extravagant names, maybe the black marketeers could have a shared symbol so its easy to recognise. Something like J.T Willisher's Exotic Consumables and Sundries

He doesn't call it innovation though. That's the thing. People criticize him for all these things he doesn't even pretend to be. They say he's trying to be an intellectual and that he's trying to do all these things, when really he's just a big nerd that likes to mess with people. He's actually an extremely humble guy…

I want to play Batman AND tanks. Specifically, tanks that are the Batmobile.

I'd have liked to have spent less time in the Batmobile.

The Batmobile always had guns on it. I imagine these are probably going to be shooting rubber bullets however. But we've seen the batmobile blow shit up all the time, though tend to be used to blow holes in buildings, and stuff.