JohnGreenArt
JohnGreenArt
JohnGreenArt

Batman used to be all about guns! Check it out:

Considering Fillion and Wahlberg are only about 6 months apart in age, yeah, if he hit the gym he could totally pull it off.

Fan art is still copyright violation, though. It's just that there's no police force that goes out looking for copyright violators. There have been plenty of fan artists that got C&D's from lawyers. Most IP owners let it slide, and for many allowing fan art or fanfic just helps their property gain popularity, but if

Selling fan art technically still is copyright violation. The problem is that IP owners selectively choose what violations to go after. Someone could go around making t-shirts with art from a specific IP and the owner doesn't flinch, but someone else makes posters from the same IP and now the owner is up in arms. Even

I want to go to there.

Never got to play Outlaws, and by the time I had a copy my computer wouldn't run it (haven't tried in awhile, but could not get it to work in DosBox or any other older PC emulator.)

For everyone complaining Nathan Fillion is too old, you all realize he and Marky Mark are the same age, right?

"Who's that sexy dude on Burn Notice?"

I had a version of Giana Sisters on C=64 that had all the sprites reskinned to make it actually into Super Mario Bros. Still not the same game as the official Nintendo version, but looked close enough to satisfy someone without the console.

If Activision sues him for copyright or trademark infringement and wins, then he should sue GoDaddy for selling him the domain registration in the first place. Activision winning would set a precedent that he had no right to claim the name, and if he had no right to it, GoDaddy had no right to sell him the domain name.

But in Final Combat, do bullets go through chain link fences???

When a company releases a "Game of the Year" version of their game, does it actually have to have been named a GOTY by some industry magazine? Like is there a committee that makes sure all GOTY editions were legitimately called a game of the year by someone? Or can a company just say "hey, we'll sell more of these if

I wasn't impressed with the Catherine demo, either, perhaps because I just didn't give it enough time.

But can I play a game in the bottom screen while watching Netflix in the top screen??? I need more stimuli, dammit!

Going by the article, wasn't this video the opening cinematic, not a trailer?

HAHAHA, you joke, but in the olden days phone companies only charged the person who was making the call, not the person who was receiving the call.

I'm not disagreeing with anything you wrote, but I just want to comment on this part:

When I first played Wolfenstein 3D, while I loved it, it always seemed weird that it was not at all the type of game the original Castle Wolfenstein was. To me it played more like a 3D version of Into the Eagles Nest.

This is the part that makes no sense to me: "buy a URL." That means you have to pay someone ELSE, so whether or not you own the trademark of a name you want to use in a URL some other company can make money off it. I've known people that have domain squatted using names that clearly were of a trademark they had no

You're mixing the books with the movies. I believe the new games are supposed to tie in with the movies, and they wrote Lewis Dodgson out of the sequel to replace him with the InGen people (InGen being taken over by John Hammond's lawyers and whatnot, instead of the corporate espionage of BioSyn.) So with that in