Java378
Java378
Java378

ARE YOU SURE? I READ THAT WAS A SYMPTOM OF EBOLA

That's what I'm wondering...maybe it's because I argued with one of the Jezebel editors. Idk honestly.

On topic: It might seem to compelling to you to argue that images don't count as child pornography if you personally can be convinced that the subjects are over 18, but the only determining factor that actually matters, in point of fact, is whether or not they are goddamned children.

There's always the Sookie Stackhouse method for naked woodsman confrontation:

ya i hate how everyone just goes along with trans-exclusionary statements like this.

that women - as a broad generalization - tend to negotiate on salary less than their male colleagues. I have no idea why

You know what's bullshit?

This would be more spot on (but probably not funnier) if she decided not to procreate to close the "wage gap" because a parent taking time to raise children is one of the biggest factors in career advancement and consistent or higher earnings.

Let me preference this by saying I'm trying to have a serious dialogue about what I think might be some of the issue.

wow so timely. michael jackson has been dead how long now?

Look, are you a junk stabbing expert? It's all well and good to run around judging others on their needle in penis solutions here on Jezebel I guess.

The idea of sexual intercourse comprising the fullness of the marital relationship isn't new in Catholic theology. It's basically the entire point of John Paul II's (enormous) discourse on the Theology of the Body, and has deep roots in Catholic moral and sacramental theology. So while openly discussing it within a

Dude, despite how the Husband tries to force me to watch The League, I have to admit when I do watch it, I laugh. It's less funny this season? =(

I only watch The League for Jenny. She is like my spirit animal.

At the core this is an information security problem and a consumer problem. Pretending that there will never be malicious people in the world is naive, so you need to protect yourself when you consume products and services. We will live in a world where what she wants is possible when the technology makes it

On Gawker this morning they mentioned that he also wrote a book called Rag Doll. Here's the summary on Amazon:

Love her, love her statement. But I'm kind of bummed about her comment, "Either your boyfriend is going to look at porn or he's going to look at you." It gives me a weird shady blamey vibe about how if your boyfriend looks at porn it's your fault because why didn't you send him naked pictures??? Also, the idea that

I understand that it's her choice. That's fine. But in an article where it directly addresses how exploited she felt, why did VF have to choose such a lazy way to portray that she's a beautiful woman? My point wasn't to question her decision, my point is questioning Vanity Fair's editorial choice.

Here's the full cover.

Lots of straight bars are super sleazy. Plus you risk getting beat up hitting on a woman at a straight bar. I kinda take offense to that overgeneralization. From all of the gay bars that I have been in 99% of them were way nicer and cleaner than any of the straight bars that I have been in.