You are uncomfortable with seeing it because you wish to deny it? They are not even romanticizing it. It is gruesome. Do you know what else they show? People getting horribly murdered every episode. And lets just forget about when Theon Greyjoy almost got raped.

How could you love Jaime? Was it already not clear he was a charming person with a very bad character in swordsmanship and sexual affiliations?

It was incest before and now it is forced incest. Are we really going to expect nice modern civilities from a show with what is now called: Child marriage, incest in at least 3 different houses (Tyrell, lannister, and the guy in the north woods), Insults towards half men [I fked that up], and what is now called child…

You're kidding, right? You better be kidding.

Yeah, I had a problem with that too. That and I do know know enough Russian born languages.

You see, it is proof like this that I like to see before I deem someone guilty. And as Emma Appleton is a lady and a true model with shoots behind her, I deem John Richardson as low as a common john or one who abuses their position of trust.

But then there were decency laws made against the single stall and mustang use. Making it public. So, locking the entire room was started.

During rape, choice is taken away.

It is usually a legal formality. Hardly anything for the media to see. Then again, sometimes you get psychos who will threaten to kill the bail judge or girls who will give bail judges the finger and then wonder why they are sent str8 to jail.
Bail hearings are…

It is standard to request bail, unless your defendant asks to stay comfy in jail. Also, there are rulings connected to one's right to a speedy trial that say one must have a bail hearing within a certain time frame.

Yes, especially when we sentence teens to life and think an unarmed teen poses a threat to a grown adult with a gun (State v. Zimmerman). We also make teens sex offenders . . .

Or a sex crime suspect.

WTF is this shit?

Is this with or without mental exercise?

And yet jurors never consider jury nullification . . .

Yeah, I already threw out the pedo hypo on this board and it was easily dismissed.

Mmmm. There are stories on Jezebel with which I could dispute that. Liek the Arizona case of child abuse with the homeless lady at the job interview.

But it could be good for his career to appear and answer the relevant questions. As long as the attorney fields the irrelevant ones about his actual relationships and upcoming films. But having Jack Sparrow at a trial about insanity would make for a good show!

So is sending a 16 year old to court for child porn charges when the subject child porn is pictures of herself, yet prosecutors fail to initially charge in the Steubenville and Maryville sexual assaults.

Where is the briefcase with the money?