I could write a thesis trying to answer those questions. The sociological implications are deep and far. I'd have to throw in a chapter on whether or not scientists use the phrase "totally gay" in their peer reviewed articles.

Sounds good.

Good to see you're still a beaming ray of sunshine.

Only curious, if you painted your skin black for Worf, would that have counted as black face? I mean, I know some idiots would say so, but what would the majority of normal people think?

Fuck. I was a tree last year. But my 18 month was an owl and I'm not creative so there's that.

I really like the hosiery here. Unsure if I'm using "hosiery" correctly.

Ya, but I'm not one to care about appropriation. I think it's a pretty stupid concept and that question is the equivalent of me telling you "you can't eat pasta" because I'm Italian.

Probably because she's a pop star and not a dance choreographer?

If you watch the commentary, Dave and Neil talk about how they had to edit out a lot of funny stuff in that skit solely for time restrictions.

I don't think that at all. I think if a dude did that, then he'd be sexually harassing you.

Christ that's dramatic. For starters, I'm not trolling. I'm on this site daily have been coming here for years and I can count on one hand the times I've trolled. Disagreeing with people and having conversations about why does not make me a troll. I consider it quite normal.

I think there's a difference between literally following someone in a manner used to intimidate and threaten and asking a benign question. I think if someone asked that question to you 50 times in a row while preventing you from moving on your way, then you'd have similar situations.

Name calling huh? Good for you.

Ya, I think there's a difference between the actions. Also, i'm sorry you had to deal with that, that's fucked up.

No, I get what they're saying, I just disagree with their conclusions.

VERY different in fact. Still not sexual harassment though. It's certainly inappropriate, but I just fail to the sexual harassment portion of it.

K. And I disagree with their conclusions, what's wrong with that? I found their explanations failed to stay on topic and the evidence only cemented my opinion that that specific question isn't sexual harassment.

Cuntrag mountain is beautiful this time of year.

oh. I thought you were talking about my conversation with another user, that's my bad.

My point is that there is not context in which that question is sexual harassment. Not trying to be lazy, but if you want to you can try to comb through the kinja hellscape to find my explanations.