Aha. So it is okay to call people fat, if they call people fat. I guess it's OK to call people n*gger if they call others n*gger, okay to a woman a rape-deserving slut if she calls another woman something like that, etc.

Of course you don't. That's my whole point.

I remember just recently a headline along the lines of "Fat Rush Limbaugh calls lesbians fat" or some such stupid thing...

I agree that conceptually tying "fatness" with low worth is sad and bad. But it's easy to stop calling likeable people fat. Much harder to refrain from calling repellant people fat, i.e., Limbaugh, Karl Rove, Chris Christie (pre-redemption.) As long as you do that, you teach your children and others that being fat…

Isn't it time to finally concede that most feminists didn't really care so much about conceptually reducing a woman to her sex organs, they just wanted to get to a place where they could do exactly the same thing?

If this story doesn't prove that Jezebel's agenda is utterly unprincipled, nothing will.

Exactly. Up until age 17, presidents' children must be accorded complete privacy and treated with the dignity and respect that private citizens deserve. At age 18, have at them, for that is when they turn into meat.

I always get a hearty, satisfying laugh when a story on a website from the Gawker empire decries a failure of journalistic standards. Soooooo meta.

The same psychological infirmities that keep certain women going back to their men even after they've been beaten repeatedly, keep certain women fans standing behind their asshole celebrity idols, no matter how shitty those idols reveal themselves in real life.

If I have a swastika tattoo, and I am told in a private business to cover it up or leave, shouldn't I? This whole rant reeks of pathetic self-absorption. Cho obviously wants to pick fights over matters of the most trivial importance.

Should have started the article with "just eyeroll," as it appears to be your strongest argument.

That's the understatement of the century.

Who here wants the Republican party to be less hated? No one. That's who.

Rollins, here:

Is saying women are better at child-rearing because they're women sexist? Yes, but if so, no more so than saying they would make better heads of state because they wouldn't go to war so readily.

Remember that piece that Henry did in the last couple of years where he fantasized about forcing a conservative woman to cook and clean for him? Sorry, he talks a good game but his schtick has had harder-than-you macho sexism at its core from day one, and he's only partly improved.

You clearly don't know how Jezebel works.

This is Jezebel. For future reference, any violent assault against a male by a woman, including an arguable sexual assault like this, is presumptively warranted and justifiable.

Just a few months ago Obama himself was opposed to gay marriage. I know that doesn't fit in easily with the good-vs-evil Jezebel worldview, but still it's worth noting.

Don't be a troll. Hate Fox above all, or take your opinions elsewhere.