So, "Although it is normally cold in winter, it was really cold this winter" is somehow wrong to you? Because that's what she says, the "Although" doesn't contradict anything. She's not saying "Although you would expect A", she's saying "Although A, Swedish authorities did A to Julian". This is normal grammar. This is…

"Meant to supply evidence" and "supplies evidence" are two completely different things. That quote doesn't supply evidence, it just says he's being treated the same as everyone else. To people who misread it, or worse change the sentence to suit them, it might look like she's saying he's being treated differently, but…

That's not basic English. Don't you see how rearranging a sentence and changing grammar makes it entirely different? "Although it is normal procedure, Swedish authorities have refused, without reason, to make the three hour trip to London and to interview Julian" is a completely different from:

"Swedish authorities…

You do realise that didn't actually counter the point? She still says the same thing? And that playground name calling doesn't actually change that?

That quote is straight forward, as you can see above. Saying the equivalent to "Nu-uh, but I'm not going to say why you're wrong, idiot" doesn't change that.

Weak to Steel?

Looks like Scizor got even better, again.

Lets break it down:

"Although it is normal procedure" This is pretty straight forward, something is normal procedure. What is it? Lets find out.

"Swedish authorities have refused, without reason, to make the three hour trip to London and to interview Julian"

So it's normal procedure to refuse, without reason, to make a…

Yes, it is normal procedure to treat everyone the same. She explains it right there. I think you think she's saying it's normal procedure to make the trip to interview people, but she's not, read what you posted again.

If any other guy got a European arrest warrant issued for them and held up in multiple courts they…

Calling bullshit doesn't make it so. An arrest warrant was issued, yet he's expecting to be treated differently. You question how often these type of arrest warrents are issued and say he's clearly being targeted, yet provide no figures. You almost seem to make it sound as though the warrants should be ignored…

Because they're treating him the same way as the law treats everyone else. He's not getting special treatment from the law for no reason, and he shouldn't expect it, exactly like the rest of us. If he wants the truth to be shown then he should go and do it straight away. If he's innocent he should show it. But he's…

Great, so if it wasn't rape he should proudly go to court and prove it. Instead of cowering he should prove that he's in fact innocent.

Innocent until proven guilty shouldn't even apply here as, according to you, as he's just plain innocent. The court will show this. If he's broken no laws then he's not guilty, he…

You didn't realise Pokemon was still relevant?

You have a lot to learn on the Internet.

And I believe he's a rapist hiding from the law.

How do we prove if either is the case? In court.

If those accusations are bogus he should proudly prove this in court. He can literally do this any time he wants, but he's not, he's hiding from it. You don't proclaim something is bogus and then expect that to be all you…

Sure, but he's wanted in Sweden for rape charges, he's just hiding from it.

I wouldn't really call that, or rape, the "right thing".

I'm an Xbox 360 and recent PC owner. I was going to stay PC exclusive, but it's looking like I might grab a PS4 when it comes out.

I never realised Kotaku wrote articles about an equivalent to Youtube comments basically.

Just wait until they see the Cheerios advert.

Eh that wasn't too bad. I get into more awkward situations than that almost every week.

They had plenty of time to try and extradite him when he was in the UK. A country where it's fareasier to extradite to the US from than Sweden, but they never. Even now, even in all the time they've had, they've still not asked for him to be extradited.

It doesn't matter how insane and medieval you believe the US legal…

Irrelevant as he's not being asked to be extradited to the US. Being the founder of Wikileaks does not mean he's allowed to rape with no consequences. It does not give him the right to do whatever he wants because, uh, maybe something might happen in a completely different country somewhere? If he does something…

Like I pointed out, the US has nothing to do with this. They haven't asked for him to be extradited, he's wanted for Rape in Sweden (AKA not the US or anything Wikileak related).

It was issued in September, and upheld again in November, both BEFORE the Wikileaks scandal. Which, just to mention, have nothing to do with the charges. Remember, the US hasn't called for him to be extradited. He's wanted for rape charges that were issued before the Wikileaks scandal.

He's wanted for rape, so he…