At least you didn’t have to clean up the damn cow yourself.

So manly man “Superman” poses are OK, but dance like a girly “diva” and we’re coming down hard on you.

Without the first step there can be no recovery.

You still haven’t read my comment. If you find time to stop spewing insults maybe you’ll get to it.

(says the person who didn’t read my comment)

Sisterhood is abusive?

You still didn’t read my comment. Perhaps the actual dumbass is signaling you from the mirror.

The author of the post hasn’t read the book, people on the thread haven’t read the book. So many opinions about a book they haven’t read!

I’m “behind” because I asked a question asking for source material that you claimed to have?

Finding someone attractive isn’t objectifying them.

No it isn’t always, but, um mostly it’s why we date.

I would say more of a requirement than a factor.

Also genitalia in no way defines who is a woman. Some of the best women I know did not come with vaginas initially installed. :)

I think actually that you’re missing the point. None of those things actually help with dating.

Let me guess, you haven’t actually read The Game (or any of Strauss’ other books.)

Why would anyone be with someone they’re not attracted to? This is such an inane observation.

Such as? (Asking seriously)

You’ve never read The Game? Read The Game! (Spoiler alert: the only winner is Courtney Love.)

It’s no Die Hard or Dirty Dancing (or a Peggy Sue Got Married for that point.) It’s a well written and well made movie with an exceptional cast but the character doesn’t actually change - instead he changes the world around him. Not that difference from The Goonies, an entertaining lark.

It takes some good wood to get those balls flying otta here.