Dollhouse.

I looked up the Wajak man. From what I found, it's not a problem with evolutionary theory at all. We didn't know where he fit into the timeline of human evolution for awhile, but that doesn't mean evolution is false or even shaky. It just means we didn't know. Not knowing something doesn't mean anything is wrong, it's…

I think we have a communications issue here. So to prevent that, let me clarify: when I say evidence, I'm using it in the scientific sense. That means something that is either directly observable or, in the case of explanations for things, has been tested, peer reviewed, and reproduced with the same results.

Also,…

Who said I'm better than anyone at all? I'm human. I'm fallible. Where did you get that from?

If you mean the Alcubierre drive, yes. But don't hold your breath for that. For one thing, it requires a ton of energy (and I'm using that idiomatically...the amount of energy is orders of magnitude more than we can ever envision making). For another, it requires negative mass, which isn't really a thing as far as we…

No, they're not. Facts are facts because of all the competing hypotheses to explain something, they have the most evidence of any.

What do you think makes a fact a fact if not that?

You know a lot of history about the theory, but so little about its evidence. Maybe focus more on the science and less on the scientists?

Science is all about accepting that we don't know things. If we thought we knew everything, science wouldn't exist.

Yes, confirmation bias is a problem. But that's what the scientific method is designed to weed out. No one looked at a few knuckle bones and said, "I want evolution to be real, so this is evidence for…

Maybe, maybe not. It depends on what you think "truth" means. If you start saying, "Hey, every interpretation of the world is equally valid," then truth means nothing because everyone's opinion can be called truth. The turtle that holds up the Earth? Invisible, but true. Russel's teapot? True. The FSM, Vishnu, Thor,…

I'm sorry, but how is "there's no evidence for this, but I'm going to believe there's a being who can do everything and knows everything and he said 'let there be' and the entire universe was" not ignorant?

Evolution doesn't ever make the claim that we know how everything came to be. In fact, that's an entirely…

Missing link...so we need to have already found every single intermediate phenotype in order to support evolution, but your side doesn't need a single shred of physical evidence to support God Did It?

Well, duh. Evolution needs three things: reproduction, mutation, and competition. Your example system has exactly....zero of those three things xD .

I don't smoke. But medically speaking, marijuana "has properties of stimulants, depressants, and hallucinogens, with a lean toward the latter".

I've had a hangover exactly once in my life. My experience was focused mostly in my stomach. I was nauseous and felt like puking for hours after I woke up that morning. I slept it off, though, and was good in no time.

Yes...replace a depressant with a mild hallucinogen. Sounds legit.

As other people mentioned: what the hell is that chip doing that it's SO GORRAM HUGE?

I attend a tech school. It's full of engineering majors, computer science majors, and other techy things. We also have plenty of creepy, douchey frat boys. They're in every subculture. If there's a frat, there are douches.

AdBlock?

"I swear, I didn't press it! The dragon's alive I tell you! GET THESE CUFFS OFF OF ME AND GO KILL THE DRAGON!"

For one second, imagine Big Dog, but with a head and some pretty skin. Now imagine someone trying to kick it down and utterly failing because Big Dog is a Balancing Badass. You're welcome for the image.