Pretty cool. I wonder when it'll be a thing.

I wasn't grilling Giz. I was making a point through satire, which obviously wasn't clear enough. And that was a typo, I meant iPad 3.

Yuck.

My point. You've missed it. Yes, it'll be called the "iPhone 5", but it's really the 6th-gen device. When the iPhone 4S was released, a lot of people complained that they "wanted the iPhone 5 instead!" And I had to explain that the 4S really IS the iPhone 5, it just has a different name. And now they're releasing the…

Haha, I just imagined that dialogue:

Illiterate? Pinkie Pie? FEH! How rude! Somepony should smack you for that.

You win, sir. I hope you don't happen to have Duchovny...

Of course it's sound; it's what happened, isn't it? Or am I the only one who sees the androbat firemen? I swear, I'm not crazy!

Your mom is the devil!

You mean the iPhone 6, right? After all, they've already had a fifth-gen iPhone for awhile now. It just had an S in its name.

You've contradicted yourself. Either that, or you're not elaborating enough. You first said that criminals don't have access to grenades or other explosives (clearly not true, given the number of bombings, but I'll ignore that for now). Then you said that criminals would have access to guns whether you restrict that…

First of all, I didn't sling any insults anywhere. Please find somewhere I did to let me know what came off as insulting, since it wasn't intentional, I assure you.

It is remarkably comprehensible, you're right...it's also still remarkably long, meaning most people still won't read it anyway. But it's a nice touch, though.

You know what? I read about 3 sentences in, and all your personal insults and attacks have led me to not even want to read any more than that. Here's a pro tip: if you want to persuade someone in any way, insulting them is the complete opposite of a good tactic.

It concerns me a little bit that Google, the biggest name in data mining, has messed up its own calculations based on its own inaccurate data...but just slightly. Everyone makes mistakes. "Do no evil" and all, right?

So basically, you're saying "the attacker might have stronger weapons, so I need equally strong weapons"? In that case, why not allow everyone to have nuclear weapons? That's guaranteed to out-arm anyone else, for the most part. Or even something smaller and more "reasonable": grenades. Why not allow civilians to keep…

"what happens if you miss your shot with the taser?" Something much less dangerous than if I missed a shot with a pistol, I'm sure.

Somehow I think that would be disabled...

I'd love that, but...I don't think it would work. My guess is it's 50GB free to be used from the device. Either it will restrict your total usage from non-device sources, or it will shut down your enhanced account after a certain time without access form the device.