Not easy to do. I don't think I'd trust a computer vision algorithm to consistently pick out the child porn and remove it. Some of the child porn would get through tagged as just regular porn, some would get through tagged as kids but not porn, and some would get through as unidentified content. Until computer vision…

Yeah, I know! The perspective of the cameras in the video annoyed the hell out of me, too.

Because motorcycles, a.k.a. motorbikes, are often called "bikes" as well?

So it's a more streamlined hovercraft? A hoverbike? Cool, I guess.

Not true. Headaches are only caused by ghosting and bad cinematography. The cinematography issue can be fixed by educating the DPs of the future; it's not a tech problem. The ghosting is simply a matter of quality of the tech used. Theaters use cheap filters and you get ghosting. If they'd step up and use better…

Colorblind? What has that got to do with anything? Almost no one's used anaglyphic glasses in quite a long time, sir...polarized is where it's at.

I know! It's like when greedy people started adding SOUND to their movies. Who needs that when you can just read what the people in your films are saying?

1) People don't want to have to put on glasses, which affect how they look, just to watch a movie. It's a vanity thing.

Because most of the Giz writers, like many people, don't understand that the wave of terrible 3D movies has been the fault of ignorant cinematographers and cheap theaters, and it has nothing to do with the technology itself. When utilized correctly, 3D can be great! :)

The problems with 3D aren't the fault of the technology. They're the fault of ignorant cinematographers and cheap theaters.

Oh, and threw* . Wow. Can't believe I made such a typo and didn't notice it until now. -_-

xD One of my favorite lines EVER! :D Every time I hear that, I always want to yell, "WHAT'S WRONG WITH A TRACEROUTE, YOU ELITIST PRICK?!" ^_^

I've connected my laptop to my monitor for awhile now when I miss those shows, but for working on it prefer the built-in screen. Although now that I have an external keyboard/mouse, that may change...I don't know, I'll have to try it when I get back to my dorm with the TV.

I don't. I watch my shows on the actual TV, either live or DVR'd. The only time I watch on the computer is if I miss a show I absolutely love, and in those rare instances, I check on Hulu (not Hulu Plus) or torrent. Only one of those options is illegal, but all are free.

I don't know. Let's look and see...nope, found nothing, it's just you.

Hm. You're right. It's not nearly as bright as the others, though, so I think it's just the way the photo was taken. That problem shouldn't happen in real life where you can easily see what's lit and what's a reflection by turning your write if you need to.

I was about to say! xD

I'm willing to bet it wasn't done on purpose. They just through in techno-jargon with the knowledge that most of their target demographic wouldn't understand it and the rest would write it off as stupid sitcom nonsense.

6:33, actually. It's not 30+10, it's 10, 20, 30. It's just the highest value that's lit, not the sum.

Because food is necessary to live. I agree unhealthy food isn't, but the point stands that you need food to live but you don't need cigarettes to do anything. There is no utility to smoking except the luxury of a false sense of relaxation, whereas you do need food to live.