I was about to ask why it's colorized blue, then I got my answer: because that's the wavelength that showed the most detail. It's beautiful.

What you did there? I see it. Of course, every episode of Castle is a killer episode in every sense of the word, so I'll let that one slide :P .

I've heard of scopolamine, actually. Albeit in the Hollywood version on Castle, but still, I've heard of it :P . Unless it actually does make you do anything you're told. Then it wasn't very Hollywood-ized.

I don't have any angle except what I've said. If you're worried about the police, don't you think they'd know this was a vaporizer if they saw it? So that's obviously not the problem. If you think what you're doing is okay, you wouldn't try to cover it up and mask it as something else unless you're just trying not to…

...again, so?

Unless I've misunderstood, this isn't basic quantum entanglement (which is what you're describing). This line is what I'm referring to: "...but rather using a photon to transmit the quantum state of one object to another". Perhaps I've misinterpreted that and this is just regular quantum entanglement? But if that's…

Why not? Is it because you think there's something wrong with underwear on the floor, perhaps? That's the difference: the problem with clothes lying around is that it's messy, not that it's clothes. The problem with a vaporizer is...well...I don't know. You tell me.

So? Why do you care what other people think if you don't think the same?

I don't get it. If there's nothing wrong with using one, why feel the need to hide it for company in the first place? And if there IS something wrong with using one, then why use it? No matter how you view its use, this product is useless as a "hidden" version of a vaporizer.

If we make an analogy by pretending the particle is a desk, the process is more clear. What's happening here is that something (the photon) records information about how the desk is put together (the state of the particle). It then travels at the speed of light to another desk 100km away, and when it hits that desk,…

Whew, good. It kills syphilis then :P .

Sticks and stones may break my bones, but Lysol will burn my eyes out?

I agree. Obviously, sex has its risks, which is why it's a parent's job to teach kids how to be safe. Dancing with clothes on, no matter how provocatively, is not dangerous, and certainly not Lysol-in-the-face worthy. If clothes start coming off...well, they're 18. I had a teacher once who said "if many students fail…

Yeah, sometimes there isn't a blank frame between the commercial break and the show, and sometimes there IS a blank frame between two commercials, so I don't see that being a very reliable method.

"The people viewing child porn propagate its production." How? Again, usually these images/videos/whatever are viewed for free by anonymous P2P users and the like. No one knows who's viewing them, if anyone. The demand is unknown except by the number of people arrested for possession, so how does viewing it propagate…

I didn't say that. It's also only true if the viewers paid for the kiddie porn, which is usually not the case. In most cases, the porn is downloaded free and anonymously using a P2P client or something like Tor. Which makes supply & demand nonexistent, as demand is unknown.

The person looking at the porn isn't the one causing that harm. It's the PRODUCERS of the porn that do it. If you watch a movie, are you the one making the actors work? No. The producers are. Same here; the people watching the porn are not the ones hurting the children, it's the producers of it that are.

Oh, I know. That's why I said it's a problem :P .

Not only this article, but every non-academic mention of the Mayan calendar since the whole hysteria began.

Sword-fighting in the most Shakespearean way possible.