It wasn't misogyny — although the post itself is blatantly misandrous. I wasn't taking women in general to task, merely the feminist ideal that only sex that has been run through their "woman-pos" filter is a good thing, while any sex that might appeal to a mere male is not. Anderson made some pretty bone-headed,…

Actually, my point was that the sex ISN'T gratuitous, it informs the subtext — but that might be too subtle a distinction for some viewers, and they should return to their Twilight DVDs.

Ugh, Jezebel, why another anti-sex feminist rant about something you don't understand?

My kids are going to have so much fun picking on kids like yours. I'm sure not learning all of those essential life skills that will earn him respect in the eyes of his masculine peers is far less important that soothing your troubled (and over-committed) conscience.

Never. Get used to it. Sex sells. And objectification is part of the authentic masculine experience.

Yeah, kissing your woman's butt is ALWAYS the answer. Considering how often a woman says one thing but means another, "listening to the woman" is only going to get you far enough to get yourself in trouble.

I'd be a lot more inclined to feel indignant over this slightly (I said "slightly") over-hyped War on Women if my daughter had to register for Selective Service on her 18th birthday and men didn't have over 90% of the jobs where death or dismemberment were strong possibilities — I'm sure in the interest of fairness…

I think this is astonishing: Ms. Barker having the gall to label this man as "creepy", when this behavior pales in comparison to the background check many men are subjected to by women who are husband shopping or plagued with baby rabies. "Creepy" is the semantic equivalent of "slut": you are verbally punishing him…

"That willingness to be an attentive lover is surely a good thing. But when these popular tips and techniques for being a great fuck are accompanied by images of a nearly unattainable masculine ideal, it's not hard to conclude that for a lot of men, that increased eagerness to please is tinged with a considerable…

If women use the service more, why not charge them for it? Or do I as a man have to subsidize your uterus? Y'all aren't dependent on individual men anymore, and are proud to pay your own way. But why should my premiums go up and yours go down to cover your highly predictable greater utilization of a rationed…

This is hysterical. Literally.

That's a faulty conclusion. It isn't society that compels a man to earn money to establish his worth — it's women. When women quit responding to displays of raw financial strength, then we'll quit being concerned about it. Or when they perfect the Japanese sexbot. But until then, our ability to provide is directly…

"Perhaps the reason Mundy only "touches upon" the "real losers" is because the theory that unmarried women are losers is, finally, becoming passé. Hey, imagine that! Future generations might live in a world where the concept that women should downplay their accomplishments if they want to get married is as outdated as…

"A women's worth is based entirely on her sexuality and "fuckability" in society. The sexism that you encounter about "being a man" is a direct result of that."

So then it's okay if men get hurt by sexism, because women hurt more, right?

While I’m not, technically speaking, an MRA, I am a participant in the wider Manosphere and support most MRA issues. And while I see a lot of nitpicking about individual MRA beliefs – and the movement is far from monolithic – I think the feminist community is missing the point of the Manosphere, and the MRA movement.