When Hamilton turned in, was there empty track between Rosberg and the right side of the track? If there was empty space, then Hamilton left him plenty of space to turn in.

Rosberg has said in an interview that he didn’t have issues with his brakes in that corner, he said he was determine to push Hamilton as wide as possible. Based on the trajectory, he would have push Hamilton right off the track.

Your analysis is totally different than what the professionals think. https://www.formula1.com/en/video/2016/… )m�=<Ƒ

Rosberg didn’t leave enough room based on his exit trajectory. Hamilton left 3+ width on the inside and 1 car width on the outside, plus Hamilton was ahead. You can see it in this video.

His entire F1 career has him always behind Lewis. Lewis almost won the WDC his first year, wins it the 2nd year. Then Lewis moves onto his team, again, and continues to beat him the entire time.

So what you are saying is if Hamilton qualifies first, Rosberg should stay in 2nd and block?

Rosberg = Lauda, Hamilton = Hunt. That’s why Lauda likes to talk crap about Hamilton.

The sad part is, had Rosberg just turned in and clipped the apex, he would have came out ahead because Hamilton had such a bad line already, then he could of ran a little wide forcing Hamilton to brake and lose momentum to the next corner.

It’s not about winning medals, it’s about the Olympic orgies.

It’s only a matter of time before someone figures out the weakness in the programming of the AI. That is what good fighter pilots can do that an AI can’t. There are instances where pilots have departed from controlled flight in order to gain an advantage, not something a typical pilot or computer would think of doing.…

I think the AI advantage is this setup is the lack of external sensors to detect the opponent. It knows what the human is doing because the program is giving the AI the exact location. We don’t have the sensor capabilities today to provide that much information.

JAFO.

Have the lawyers send them a bill for the typical rental rate for those vehicles.

This is why they added the stupid automatic light position on most light controls.

Finally!

Not really, adding ballast is always the prefer option than letting an engineer built a slightly heavier part. You only need to make parts as reliable as its service life.

At 1:08, you can see where the boulder use to be. Half of it was buried in the ground.

From an engineering standpoint, she would be a good fit in a F1 car. She weighs, what maybe 90 lbs with a helmet? That’s probable a good 30-40 lbs of ballast that can be moved where it needs to go.

Time to pay a visit to the local congressmen.

There’s nothing wrong with the shifter, it’s the operator that is the issue. It is why we have a brake interlock in order to shift out of park. Dumb people just shouldn’t drive.