Huffytoss
Huffytoss
Huffytoss

The ones coming out of Scarebus Helicopters Canada are better. But then why would you want a helicopter built by frogs? Their rotor blades are backwards.

That’s because LAPD is corrupt. They have just as many helicopters as the LA County Sheriffs. No city that size needs to have 18 helicopters.

FYI, Time frames are made in France. They are one of the few companies that even weave their own carbon fiber. So in this case, you can’t even say it was made with the same tooling.

Simple solution to this problem. Use another RC aircraft to take down the drone. I would volunteer to do that. I’ll contact my buddy who is in charge of Forest service aerial fire fighting to see if that can be done.

Now playing

Aircraft style controls seems to be the norm. My college prof designed the engine on the Bub 7 which held the record a couple years ago at 367 mph. They used two airplane grips on their controls.

Tesla needs to quit whining and just buy off the politicians like everyone else does.

The mechanic down the street isn’t going to know what to do with a Tesla.

Just wait, he’ll be slapped with a sexual harassment lawsuit for trying to hump her.

The lack of contrails will also increase the earth’s temperature by not reflecting the sun. They been wanting to test this theory but no one would ground all the flights...until 9/11/01 when all the flights were grounded. The earth’s temperature did go up.

That’s not true. The government wanted a plane that did everything. Lockheed won the contract to build a plane that can do everything. Then they realized they can’t build a plane that can do everything. So then the government has to keep dumping more money and keep lowering the requirements to get a plane in a timely

Straight from Lockheed:

It goes back to my point, no one expects the B-2 to dogfight because it is not a fighter. When they redesigned the F-8 Crusader into the A-7 Corsair II, it lost its dogfighting abilities and everyone knows that. Heck, departure from controlled flight was its method to disengage from a dogfight. If the F-35 is marketed

F-117 was never a fighter. It was a bomber. They only called it a fighter because it was the only way they could get their top fighter jocks to fly around in A-7’s before flying the F-117. The A-7 is just as capable of dogfighting as the F-117.

The whole issue with ITAR is stupid, just go ahead and try to remove something from the internet.

Technology is why people do get lost. When the GPS tells someone to turn right, they turn right, without ever thinking about it. That’s why we have people that get lost all the time driving to the Grand Canyon. If you look at a map, paper or electronic, it’s pretty clear where there are paved roads and dirt roads. If

Not when you don’t design in the capabilities. Dogfighting is the equivalent of hand to hand combat. If they didn’t want the plane to be able to dogfight, they should change the designation to B-35. They might as well take air combat maneuvering out of the curriculum. No need to waste all that jet fuel to teach

It’s widely known that if we ever get into a war with China, their strategy is to go all out and attack S. Korea, Japan, and Taiwan at the same time. They know the US would not be able to cover all that at the same time. Even Taiwan knows that they wouldn’t be able to defend the island, which is why their targets are

But the pentagon dumped all their money into the F-35 to replace all the other planes. That’s the problem. It’s a jack of all trades, but master of none.

This is like saying we don’t need to know how to fight hand to hand or use a bayonet because we can just shoot the person 300 yards away.

How about F1. It has all been about brake management with the energy recovery system since the rotors are tiny now.